- #1

- 37

- 0

If I have something bounded by $$f(x) = x^2 + 1$$. I can write $$x = \sqrt{y - 1}$$. But, is it wrong to swap axis to show that I'm integrating dy, not dx?

- Thread starter 0kelvin
- Start date

- #1

- 37

- 0

If I have something bounded by $$f(x) = x^2 + 1$$. I can write $$x = \sqrt{y - 1}$$. But, is it wrong to swap axis to show that I'm integrating dy, not dx?

- #2

mfb

Mentor

- 35,269

- 11,538

Consider a simpler two-dimensional example. What is the area between your f(x), the x and y axis and x=1? Well, it is ##\int_0^1 f(x) dx = \frac{3}{2}##. What if we want to integrate over y? f(x) changes from 1 to 2 but our area starts at y=0, so we set up ##\int_0^2 ? dy##. The function we need to integrate over is the length between (f(x) OR x=0) and x=1 in the horizontal axis, the length is 1 for y<1 and ##1-x(y) = 1-\sqrt{y-1}## for y between 1 and 2. To avoid using a case structure let's split the integral in two parts: ##\int_0^1 1 dy + \int_1^2 (1-\sqrt{y-1}) dy##. If you calculate that you should get the same result as before, ##1+\frac 1 2 = \frac 3 2## - but it was way more messy.

The same applies to the solids of revolution. You can integrate over the volume in any order you want, but some are more convenient.

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 729

- Last Post

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 13

- Views
- 798

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 925