- #1

- 48

- 4

If I have something bounded by $$f(x) = x^2 + 1$$. I can write $$x = \sqrt{y - 1}$$. But, is it wrong to swap axis to show that I'm integrating dy, not dx?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter 0kelvin
- Start date

- #1

- 48

- 4

If I have something bounded by $$f(x) = x^2 + 1$$. I can write $$x = \sqrt{y - 1}$$. But, is it wrong to swap axis to show that I'm integrating dy, not dx?

- #2

mfb

Mentor

- 35,909

- 12,733

Consider a simpler two-dimensional example. What is the area between your f(x), the x and y axis and x=1? Well, it is ##\int_0^1 f(x) dx = \frac{3}{2}##. What if we want to integrate over y? f(x) changes from 1 to 2 but our area starts at y=0, so we set up ##\int_0^2 ? dy##. The function we need to integrate over is the length between (f(x) OR x=0) and x=1 in the horizontal axis, the length is 1 for y<1 and ##1-x(y) = 1-\sqrt{y-1}## for y between 1 and 2. To avoid using a case structure let's split the integral in two parts: ##\int_0^1 1 dy + \int_1^2 (1-\sqrt{y-1}) dy##. If you calculate that you should get the same result as before, ##1+\frac 1 2 = \frac 3 2## - but it was way more messy.

The same applies to the solids of revolution. You can integrate over the volume in any order you want, but some are more convenient.

Share: