MHB Solve $(2x+1)(3x+1)(5x+1)(30x+1)=10$: Real Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Find all real solutions of the equation $(2x+1)(3x+1)(5x+1)(30x+1)=10$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Find all real solutions of the equation $(2x+1)(3x+1)(5x+1)(30x+1)=10$.

we have $(2x+1)(30x+1)(3x+1)(5x+1) = 10$
or $(60x^2+ 32x + 1)(15x^2+ 8x + 1) = 10$

letting $15x^2 + 8x = t$

$(4t+1)(t+1) = 10$

or $4t^2 + 5 t + 1 = 10$

or $4t^2 + 5t - 9 = 0$

or $(4t+9)(t-1) =0 $



t = 1 or -9/4

t = 1 gives

$15x^2 + 8x-1=0$ giving $x = \dfrac{-4\pm\sqrt{31}}{15}$or $(15x^2 + 8x +\frac{9}4{4}) = 0$

or $(60x^2+ 32x + 9) = 0$

this gives complex solution

so solutions are $x = \dfrac{-4\pm\sqrt{31}}{15}$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Back
Top