Solve Bohr Atom Problem: Find Radius, Energy, Wavelenght

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fabio010
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom Bohr
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the radius, energy, and wavelength for a hydrogen atom where the electron is replaced by a negatively charged meson with a mass 207 times that of the electron. The original poster presents calculations for these parameters but finds discrepancies with textbook solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the radius and energy using modified formulas, substituting the electron mass with that of the meson. Some participants question the validity of this substitution, suggesting the need to consider the reduced mass of the system.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the implications of using the meson's mass in calculations and discussing the assumptions made regarding the center of mass. There is acknowledgment of the differences between the original poster's results and the textbook solutions, with suggestions for further reading on reduced mass.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's approach may not align with the assumptions made in the textbook, particularly regarding the treatment of the meson and proton system. The discussion highlights the need for precision in calculations involving non-negligible masses.

Fabio010
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Find the first radius, the energy of "connection" and the wavelength of the first risk of Lyman series of a hydrogen atom that electron has been "replaced" for a meson with negative charge with a mass 207*electron mass. Radius:

r = (h^2*n^2)/(4pi^2*e^2*k*me)

we know all constants so we just replace me for 207me and the solution is 2.6*10^-13m
in book solution the result is 2.8*10^-13m (i don't think that the difference is not significant)Energy of "connection"

E = - (ke^2)/(2r)

as we now radius, the energy is -4.4 *10^-16 J
in book is = -4.04*10^-16 JWavelenght (the problem)

E = hc/l (l = wavelength)

l = hc/(4.4 *10^-16) = 4.5 * 10^-10 m 0.45 nm
but in book solutions l = 0.656nm

the problem is that with book results

l = hc/(4.04*10^-16) = 4.9 * 10^-10 m 0.49 nmSo i guess that i resolved it in a wrong way.PS: Sorry my english.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By simply replacing me with 207me, you are assuming that the meson is orbiting the centre of mass of the hydrogen proton. This assumption is valid for electron orbits as their mass is negligible for all intents and purposes, but as the proton is only ~9 times more massive than the meson, we must account for the fact that the proton and meson will orbit the proton-meson system's centre of mass.

To do this, we have to use the concept of reduced mass to reduce the problem back to a one-body problem. (the wiki below is quite good, as is the hyperphysics page).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduced_mass
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/orbv.html#rm

I recommend that you give those a read. If you need any more information, this concept is covered in every undergrad physics textbook I've come across.
 
ok, so i resolved my problem in wrong way.

because i can not replace the me for 207me?
 
I wouldn't say it was resolved in the wrong way, your reasoning will work well enough for any purpose where the orbiting particle has negligible mass compared to the nucleus.

The same idea applies when we model planetary orbits. Assuming that the orbiting body orbits the centre of mass of the more massive body gives us an accurate enough prediction, but for increased precision we have to take into account the fact that the massive body isn't stationary, it instead orbits the centre of mass of the entire system.
 
Ok but what i assumed, is what the book assumed because the solutions are correct.

Just, the wavelength solution is different. I don't know if the solutions are wrong, or E = hc/λ is not the right way to do it.
 
Well, your solution is incorrect at two significant figures, so I presume your book didn't make that assumption, and you may have to use reduced mass in the future.

It seems like you have been asked to find the first Lyman series wavelength for this atom, correct? You have worked out the wavelength of a photon with energy equal to that of the n=1 level for this atom. The first Lyman series wavelength will be brought about by the transition of the meson between the n=1 and n=2 energy levels. This should give you the correct answer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K