MHB Solve Bracelet Problem w/14 Beads (Red, White, Blue)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrtwhs
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of distinct bracelets that can be formed with 14 beads in specific colors: 6 red, 5 white, and 3 blue. The user applies Burnside's lemma, identifying a group of transformations with 28 elements, including rotations and reflections. They present their calculation, arriving at a total of 6036 distinct arrangements. Other participants are invited to confirm this result or suggest alternative methods, but no better strategies are provided. The conversation emphasizes the application of combinatorial techniques in solving the problem.
mrtwhs
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
How many essentially different bracelets can be made from 14 beads consisting of 6 red beads, 5 white beads, and 3 blue beads? Arrangements obtained by rotation or reflection are considered equivalent.

I have being trying to use Burnside's lemma to solve this. My group of transformations has 28 elements - the identity, 13 rotations, 7 reflections along lines between 2 beads, and 7 reflections through 2 beads. Number the beads from 1 to 14. Here is an example of a reflection between 2 beads: (1 14)(2 13)(3 12)(4 11)(5 10)(6 9)(7 8). Here is an example of a reflection through 2 beads: (1)(2 14)(3 13)(4 12)(5 11)(6 10)(7 9)(8).

My solution is: $$\dfrac{\dfrac{14!}{6!5!3!} + 7 \cdot 120}{28}=6036$$.

Can anyone confirm this or point out my error or provide a better strategy?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll confirm it.
And no, I'm not aware of a better strategy.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K