Solve Bungy Jump Problem: Acceleration at Bottom

  • Thread starter Thread starter ff93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jump
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a bungee jump scenario where the jumper's acceleration at the lowest point is to be determined. The context includes parameters such as the height of the jump, the unstretched length of the bungee cord, the spring constant, and the mass of the jumper.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of energy principles and the relationship between gravitational potential energy and elastic potential energy. There are attempts to express the height in terms of the stretch of the bungee cord and questions about the correct application of forces and equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and confirming each other's reasoning. There is a focus on ensuring that all forces are considered in the application of Newton's second law. Multiple interpretations of the equations are being explored, and guidance has been offered regarding the direction of acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the implications of the equations and the physical setup, questioning assumptions about the signs of forces and the meaning of the results. There is a recognition of the potential for multiple solutions based on the equations used.

ff93
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
You go bungee jumping from a bridge that is 65m high, the bungee cord has an unstretched length of 32m and a spring constant of k=107 N/m
You have a mass of 75kg.

Question: what is the acceleration at the bottom, closest to the ground?

I`ve tried to use 1/2kA2=1/2mx+1/2kx2
but it doesn´t seem to work for me :(

please help, I´m not asking for U to solve it but at least give me a couple of hints!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by figuring out where the lowest point is. Use conservation of energy.
 
should I use mgh=1/2kx2?

x as how far it stretches from 32m?

and then should I use F=-kx => F=ma and solve out a?
 
ff93 said:
should I use mgh=1/2kx2?

x as how far it stretches from 32m?
Yes. Hint: Express h in terms of x. (Measure gravitational PE from the lowest point.)
 
you mean mg(x+32)=1/2kx2?

should I then continue with F=-kx => F=ma solve out a?
 
ff93 said:
you mean mg(x+32)=1/2kx2?
Exactly.
should I then continue with F=-kx => F=ma solve out a?
Be sure to include all forces when applying F=ma.
 
mg(x+32)=1/2kx2 gives two answers but I can throw away the negative one, right?

then I used F=-kx+mg => a= (-kx+mg)/m
is that right?
 
Last edited:
ff93 said:
mg(x+32)=1/2kx2 gives two answers but I can throw away the negative one, right?
Right.

then I used F=-kx+mg => a= (-kx+mg)/m
is that right?
Yes, that's fine.

Don't get hung up with signs. You have an upward force of magnitude kx and downward force of magnitude mg. Which direction will the acceleration be in at the lowest point?
 
the direction will be "up",negative
right?
 
  • #10
ff93 said:
the direction will be "up",negative
right?
Yes, the acceleration will be up. Which you happen to call negative. I suspect that they only care about the magnitude of that acceleration.
 
  • #11
thank you for the help!:smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K