Solve Collision Lab: Mass 1 & 2 = 0.541 kg | Error %?

  • Thread starter Thread starter F.B
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a collision lab involving two masses, each weighing 0.541 kg, where participants analyze the conservation of kinetic energy and momentum before and after the collision. The original poster presents their calculations for initial and final velocities and seeks clarification on the percentage of error in their results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for kinetic energy and momentum, questioning the assumption of kinetic energy conservation in inelastic collisions. They explore how to calculate the percentage of error and the implications of measurement uncertainties on their results.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the calculation of percentage error and have noted the importance of considering measurement uncertainties. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the differences in momentum before and after the collision.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to account for error in measurements and the potential impact of angle measurement accuracy on the results. There is a recognition that kinetic energy is expected to differ before and after the collision, which is a key point of discussion.

F.B
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
I am still doing my lab and now I am stuck on this collision. Can anyone tell me if i did this right.

*U=initial velocity and V=final velocity

Mass 1 = Mass 2 = 0.541 kg
U(1)= 0.29 m/s [40 N of E]
U(2)= 0.29 m/s [35 N of W]
V(1) =0.26 m/s [36 N of W]
V(2) = 0.26 m/s [30 N of E]

Oh these values were measured they weren't given to me.

Ok here are my calculations.

Ekbefore=Ekafter
1/2m(1)U(1)^2 + 1/2m(2)U(2)^2 = 1/2m(1)V(1)^2 + 1/2m(2)V(1)^2
0.29^2 + 0.29^2 = 0.26^2 + 0.26^2
0.1682=0.1352

How would you find the percentage of error and what percentage would be reason to be off by.

Pbefore=Pafter
m(1)U(1) + m(2)U(2) = m(1)V(1) + m(2)V(2)
0.29[40 N of E] + 0.29[35 N of W] = 0.26[36 N of W] + 0.26[30 N of E]

X component of Pbefore.
0.29cos40 - 0.29cos35 = -0.0154

Y-component
0.29sin40 + 0.29sin35 = 0.353

Pbefore = square root (0.353^2 + 0.0154^2) = 0.353

Pafter x = -0.26cos36 + 0.26cos30 = 0.0148
Pafter y = 0.26sin36 + 0.26sin30 = 0.253

Pafter = square root (0.253^2 + 0.0148^2) = 0.253

Is that all right or am i doing something wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F.B said:
Ekbefore=Ekafter
1/2m(1)U(1)^2 + 1/2m(2)U(2)^2 = 1/2m(1)V(1)^2 + 1/2m(2)V(1)^2
0.29^2 + 0.29^2 = 0.26^2 + 0.26^2
0.1682=0.1352
How would you find the percentage of error and what percentage would be reason to be off by.
Kinetic energy should not be assumed to be constant. Only in perfectly elastic collisions will KE be conserved. Perfectly elastic collisions only occur for small gas molecules. Assume tha KE before is NOT equal to KE after. KE will be partially converted to heat and sound during the collison, so KE after will be less.

Pbefore=Pafter
m(1)U(1) + m(2)U(2) = m(1)V(1) + m(2)V(2)
0.29[40 N of E] + 0.29[35 N of W] = 0.26[36 N of W] + 0.26[30 N of E]
X component of Pbefore.
0.29cos40 - 0.29cos35 = -0.0154
Y-component
0.29sin40 + 0.29sin35 = 0.353
Pbefore = square root (0.353^2 + 0.0154^2) = 0.353
Pafter x = -0.26cos36 + 0.26cos30 = 0.0148
Pafter y = 0.26sin36 + 0.26sin30 = 0.253
Pafter = square root (0.253^2 + 0.0148^2) = 0.253
Is that all right or am i doing something wrong.
Your math seems to be correct (I don't have my calcualtor, but I assume you entered your digits correctly). Obviously 0.353 is not equal to 0.253. These shoudl be the same number. My guess is measurements of angles would be the main source of error (most likely). How certain are you of the measured angles? Better than plus or minus 1 degree? Do a sample recalculation while changing the angles all by plus one degree and notice how the answers change.

Are you supposed to propagate errors here?
 
Yes we are supposed to take into account error. But i have one question how do we determine the error percentage between the befores and afters
 
OK.

For KE, there is supposed to be a difference before and after. With your calculated results you can calculate the percentage of KE lost:

(KEbefore-KEafter)/before
convert this decimal into percent if you wish. Unless you estimated the uncertainty of each measurement, all you can do is verify that this is a reasonable amount of KE to lose (based on the sound created during impact and the amount of friction present).

For the conservation of momentum, you have a problem. No matter what, momentum must be conserved, so your before and after disparity shows that measurements MUST have been off. Find the percentage difference the same way [ (before-after)/before which can also be considered (theoretical - actual)/ theoretical ] .

Since the momentum definitely shows that measurements were off by a bit, then you can definitely say that the amount of KE lost must also be off by a similar (but not equal) percentage.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K