MHB Solve Complex Number IV Problem: Find Radius & Centre

Punch
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
A complex number is represented by the point P in an Argand diagram. If the real part of the complex number w=\frac{z+1}{z-2i} (z not 2i) is zero, show that the locus of P is a circle and find the radius and centre of the circle.

I have a problem manipulating w to find the real part of w
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Punch said:
A complex number is represented by the point P in an Argand diagram. If the real part of the complex number w=\frac{z+1}{z-2i} (z not 2i) is zero, show that the locus of P is a circle and find the radius and centre of the circle.

I have a problem manipulating w to find the real part of w

Hi Punch,

Let \(z=x+yi\) where \(x,y\in\Re\).

\[w=\frac{z+1}{z-2i}=\frac{(x+1)+yi}{x+(y-2)i}\]

Now multiply both the numerator and the denominator by \(x-(y-2)i\). Hope you can continue. :)
 
Sudharaka said:
Hi Punch,

Let \(z=x+yi\) where \(x,y\in\Re\).

\[w=\frac{z+1}{z-2i}=\frac{(x+1)+yi}{x+(y-2)i}\]

Now multiply both the numerator and the denominator by \(x-(y-2)i\). Hope you can continue. :)

I followed as you said but couldn't find how to extract the real part out...
 
Punch said:
I followed as you said but couldn't find how to extract the real part out...

What did you get after multiplying by \(x-(y-2)i\) ?
 
Sudharaka said:
What did you get after multiplying by \(x-(y-2)i\) ?

With regards to the real part, \frac{x^2+x+y^2+2y}{x^2+y^2-2y+4}=0

But I do not see how i can use this
 
Punch said:
With regards to the real part, \[\frac{x^2+x+y^2+2y}{x^2+y^2-2y+4}=0\]

But I do not see how i can use this

\[Re(w)=\frac{x^2+x+y^2-2y}{x^2+y^2-4y+4}\]

As you may see, you have calculated the real part incorrectly. Check your calculation again.

Since, \(Re(w)=0\Rightarrow x^2+x+y^2-2y=0\)

Now can you try to transform this equation into the form \((x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=r^2\). The complex number \(z\) is on this circle. All you got to do is find \(a, b\) and \(c\).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top