Solve Compound Sum for Unknown: a, c, l, and m

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ktoz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a summation formula that calculates the compound sum of terms involving multiple variables. Participants explore the possibility of isolating an unknown variable, specifically "m," from the compound sum formula. The context includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of the properties of summation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a compound sum formula and questions whether it is possible to solve for the unknown variable "m" given a specific compound sum.
  • Another participant simplifies the original formula to focus on isolating "m" but expresses uncertainty about the rearrangement process.
  • Some participants critique the notation used in the original post, questioning the necessity of four variables to define an arithmetic sequence.
  • A participant explains the purpose of the four variables, emphasizing their role in allowing for compound summation and providing examples to illustrate the concept.
  • Examples are provided to demonstrate how the formula works with specific values for the variables, reinforcing the inquiry about isolating "m."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the clarity of the notation or the necessity of the four variables. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the method to isolate "m" from the compound sum formula.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of mathematical background, which may influence their understanding of the notation and the complexity of the problem. The discussion includes attempts to clarify definitions and the structure of the summation process.

ktoz
Messages
170
Reaction score
12
Hi

I have a summation formula that can calculate the compound sum of terms

(a + c0) + (a + c1) + (a + c2) ... + (a + cm) to any level. Or put another way, it can sum the terms, sum the sums of the terms sum the sums of the sums of the terms etc.

Given
a = element of reals
c = element of reals
l = element of naturals
m = element of naturals

where
a = 1
c = 1
l = 1
m = 4

10 = [tex]\frac{(m + l)!(a(l + 1) + cm)}{m!(l + 1)!}[/tex]

where
a = 1
c = 2
l = 2
m = 4

30 = [tex]\frac{(m + l)!(a(l + 1) + cm)}{m!(l + 1)!}[/tex]

etc

What I'm wondering is, if given a compound sum and an unknown m, is it possible to do some sorcery and solve for m?

For example, with the simple case of summing naturals

v = [tex]\frac{n(n + 1)}{2}[/tex]
n = [tex]\frac{(sqrt(8v + 1) - 1)}{2}[/tex]

Can the same sort of thing be done with the above compound sum formula?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Omitting all the extraneous stuff from above, it becomes

[tex]v = \frac{(m + l)!(al + a + cm)}{m!(l + 1)!} [/tex]

Rearranging terms and expanding factorials I got this

[tex]v = \frac {(al + a + cm)(m + 1)(m + 2)(m + 3) ... \times (m + l)}{1 \times 2 \times 3 ... \times (l + 1)}[/tex]

But what I don't know is if there is any way to rearrange the above to isolate the m term. Anyone know if there is a general way to do that?
 
Last edited:
Your notation is incredibly confusing... why do you need four variables to define an arithmetic sequence? At worst you should only need three
 
Office_Shredder said:
Your notation is incredibly confusing...

Sorry. Highest level math I took in school was Algebra 2 (twenty years ago) so I'm kind of making it up as I go along.

Why do you need four variables to define an arithmetic sequence? At worst you should only need three

It's to allow for compound summation. for example

a = real = starting point
c = real = constant difference
m = natural = zero based term index
l = natural = zero based summation level

Example 1:
a = 1, c = 1, m = 5, l = 4

Sum table:
0 1 2 3 4 5 m
----------------------------------------
1 1 1 1 1 1 c
----------------------------------------
1 2 3 4 5 6 l = 0
1 3 6 10 15 21 l = 1
1 4 10 20 35 56 l = 2
1 5 15 35 70 126 l = 3
1 6 21 56 126 252 l = 4

Plugged into formula
[tex]252 = \frac{(5 + 4)!(1 \times 4 + 1 + 1 * 5)}{5!(4 + 1)!}[/tex]

Example 2:
a = 1, c = 5, m = 5, l = 4

Sum table:
0 1 2 3 4 5 m
----------------------------------------
0 5 5 5 5 5 c
----------------------------------------
1 6 11 16 21 26 l = 0
1 7 18 34 55 81 l = 1
1 8 26 60 115 196 l = 2
1 9 35 95 210 406 l = 3
1 10 45 140 350 756 l = 4

Plugged into formula
[tex]756 = \frac{(5 + 4)!(1 \times 4 + 1 + 5 * 5)}{5!(4 + 1)!}[/tex]

What the formula does isn't as much of a concern as how to isolate "m"
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K