MHB Solve Distance Formula Problem: Parametric Equations & Slope

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Distance formula problem?

Sally and Hannah are lost in the desert. Sally is 5 km north and 3 km east of Hannah. At the same time, they both begin walking east. Sally walks at 2 km/hr and Hannah walks at 3 km/hr.

1. When will they be 10 km apart?
2. When will the line through their locations be perpendicular to the line through their starting locations?

I found that answer for #1 is 11.66. #2 answer is 34/3 but I don't know how to solve for #2.

Here is a link to the question:

Distance formula problem? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: eb's question from Yahoo! Answers regarding distance, parametric equations and slope

Hello eb,

I would place Hannah initially at the origin (0,0), and Sally at (3,5).

1.) I would choose to represent the positions of Hannah and Sally parametrically. The unit of distance is km and the unit of time is hr. So, we may state:

$$H(t)=\langle 3t,0 \rangle$$

$$S(t)=\langle 2t+3,5 \rangle$$

and so the distance between them at time $t$ is:

$$d(t)=\sqrt{((2t+3)-3t)^2+(5-0)^2}=\sqrt{t^2-6t+34}$$

Now, letting $d(t)=10$ and solving for $0\le t$, we find:

$$10=\sqrt{t^2-6t+34}$$

Square both sides and write in standard form:

$$t^2-6t-66=0$$

Use of the quadratic formula yields one non-negative root:

$$t=3+5\sqrt{3}\approx11.66$$

2.) Initially the slope of the line through their positions is $$\frac{5}{3}$$, and so we want to equate the slope of the line through their positions at time $t$ to the negative reciprocal of this as follows:

$$\frac{5-0}{2t+3-3t}=-\frac{3}{5}$$

$$\frac{5}{t-3}=\frac{3}{5}$$

Cross-multiply:

$$3t-9=25$$

$$3t=34$$

$$t=\frac{34}{3}$$

To eb and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other parametric equation/analytic geometry questions in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f21/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Last edited:
Re: eb's question from Yahoo! Answers regarding distance, parametric equations and slope

A new member to MHB, Niall, has asked for clarification:

I'm a bit confused on how you got S(t) = (2t + 3, 5) and H(t) = (3t, 0) could you explain that?

Hello Niall and welcome to MHB! (Rock)

The $y$-coordinate of both young ladies will remain constant as they are walking due east. Since they are walking at a constant rate, we know their respective $x$-coordinates will be linear functions, where the slope of the line is given by their speed, and the intercept is given by their initial position $x_0$, i.e.

$$x(t)=vt+x_0$$

Sarah's speed is 2 kph and her initial position is 3, hence:

$$S(t)=2t+3$$

Hannah's speed is 3 kph and her initial position is 0, hence:

$$H(t)=3t+0=3t$$

Does this explain things clearly? If not, I will be happy to try to explain in another way.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top