Solve Efficiency Problem: Heat Water in 1000 W Electric Kettle

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsnerd7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the time required for a 1000 W electric kettle to heat 1.0 L of water from 10 °C to boiling point, factoring in a 63% efficiency rate. The correct approach involves using the formula Δt = (mwater x cwater x (Tf - Ti) + miron x ciron x (Tf - Ti)) / P, where P is the effective power (630 W). Participants concluded that the mass and composition of the kettle do not significantly affect the heating time, as the primary factor is the power output directed towards the water.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic thermodynamics principles, specifically heat transfer.
  • Familiarity with the specific heat capacity of water (4.2E3 J/kg°C) and iron.
  • Knowledge of power calculations using the formula P = W/Δt.
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving mass and temperature changes.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific heat capacity of iron to incorporate it into heating calculations.
  • Learn about energy transfer efficiency in heating systems.
  • Explore advanced thermodynamics concepts, such as energy conservation laws.
  • Investigate the impact of material properties on heat transfer rates in practical applications.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, engineers working with heating systems, and anyone interested in thermodynamics and energy efficiency calculations.

physicsnerd7
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the amount of time it will take a 1000 W electric kettle to heat up 1.0 L of water to boiling point if the water starts at 10 °C and the kettle is made from 400 g of iron. The transfer of heat energy from the kettle to the water is 63%.

Homework Equations


P = W/Δt
Q = mcΔT

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so what i was thinking was find 63% of the 1000 W electric kettle and then that is the power used to bring the water to a boil so I did -

Pfor water = 1000W x 0.63
= 630 W

then I would use this power in the formula P = W/Δt to find time so I did -

Δt = (mwater x cwater x (Tf of water - Ti of water) ) / 630 W

= (1kg x 4.2E3 J/kgC x (100 C - 10 C )) / 630 W
= 600s ||or|| 10 min

apparently this answer is wrong because I am suppose to incorporate the mass of the iron kettle but I don't know how. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the correct equation for the energy needed to heat the water mwater x cwater x (Tf of water - Ti of water). Write similar equation for the energy needed to heat the iron. What laws do you know about energy?

PS: I believe they are saying that the 63% figure applies between the kettle and the water not the element and the water.
 
Last edited:
Δt = (mwater x cwater x (Tf of water - Ti of water) + miron x ciron x(Tf iron - Ti iron)) / 630 W

Is ^ this correct then. I know that energy can't be created or destroyed and that it is only transferred from one form to another.
 
The more I think about this problem the more I think it's badly specified and your first answer based on 63% of 1000W could be justified.
 
CWatters said:
The more I think about this problem the more I think it's badly specified and your first answer based on 63% of 1000W could be justified.
I agree. Based on the masses and specific heats, you'd think 96% of the heat would go into the water (did I get that right?). If only 63% went that way then the rest has been radiated/convected away to the room. This leaves the OP calculation as the only route to the answer. The mass and composition of the kettle are irrelevant.
 
Okay so then the 600 s answer is right then because the only thing affecting the heating up of the water is the amount of power the kettle has and not what the kettle is made from. And since the kettle is only 63% efficient then only 630W is going towards heating the water.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
34K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
22K
Replies
5
Views
35K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K