Solve Ehrenfest's Theorem: Find Position Expectation Value

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving Ehrenfest's Theorem for the expectation value of position of a particle confined to a circle. The user seeks clarification on applying the equation m*(d^2/dt^2) = to the function ), noting that this function is not a linear variable like . The conversation highlights the importance of classical Lagrangian mechanics in deriving classical values for force and energy, which can then be compared to quantum analogs. The user expresses gratitude for the guidance received, indicating progress in their understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Ehrenfest's Theorem
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Classical Lagrangian mechanics
  • Complex functions and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Ehrenfest's Theorem in detail, focusing on its application to circular motion.
  • Learn about the implications of using complex variables in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore classical Lagrangian mechanics to derive forces for circular motion.
  • Investigate the relationship between classical and quantum mechanics for confined systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying Ehrenfest's Theorem and its applications to particles in constrained geometries.

majeka
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have been asked to "find a solution to Ehrenfest's Theorem" (in this case for the expectation value of position, of a particle confined to a circle). What does this mean - what kind of answer should i find?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Thankyou, I have searched many times on google and other search engines, and have found (as on the websites you have shown me) that

m*(d^2/dt^2)<x> = <F>

which is a result of the form that I am looking for. But instead of <x> I have <exp(I*theta)>, so a function of theta, as I am interested in a particle confined to a circle. I have not been able to find out whether or not I can still use this same equation (despite my <exp(I*theta)> not being a linear variable like <x>). Please understand my problems with this; I am not trying to get someone else to do my homework for me - if you have never found it hard to do your 'homework', then you are very lucky.
 
I don't remember all the details, but I thought for a potential proportional to r^2, you should expect out the classical value for such quantities as force and energy. You might want to try finding the classical value of the force for a particle confined to a circle using classical lagrangian mechanics, I don't think its that hard, and compare this answer to the quantum ananlog. Just an idea.
 
thanks!

Thanks spdf13,
I've tried what you said and I think it has worked...
Cheers!
:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K