Solve Equation II: $\frac{25x-2}{4}=\frac{13x+4}{3}$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation $\left\lfloor \dfrac{25x-2}{4} \right\rfloor=\dfrac{13x+4}{3}$ was discussed, focusing on solving for the variable x. The solution involves understanding the floor function and its implications on the equality. Participants acknowledged the contributions of user kaliprasad in solving the equation, highlighting the collaborative nature of the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of floor functions in mathematics
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Familiarity with solving equations involving fractions
  • Knowledge of inequalities and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the floor function in detail
  • Learn techniques for solving fractional equations
  • Explore algebraic methods for isolating variables
  • Investigate real-world applications of floor functions in programming
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in solving complex equations involving floor functions and fractions.

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Solve the equation $\left\lfloor \dfrac{25x-2}{4} \right\rfloor=\dfrac{13x+4}{3}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Solve the equation $\left\lfloor \dfrac{25x-2}{4} \right\rfloor=\dfrac{13x+4}{3}$.

Subtract 1 from both sides
$\lfloor\frac{25x-6}{4}\rfloor = \frac{13x+1}{3}$
So $\frac{13x + 1}{3}$ = integer say n
So x = $\frac{3n-1}{13}$
So we get
$\lfloor\frac{25\frac{3n-1}{13}-6}{4}\rfloor = n$
Or
$\lfloor\frac{75n-103}{52}\rfloor = n$
Or 23n-103= > 0 and < 52
Or 103 <= 23n < 155
Or $\frac{103}{23} <=n < \frac{155}{23}$
So n = 5 or 6
Hence x = $\frac{14}{13}$ or $\frac{17}{13}$
 
Well done, kaliprasad! :)

But, if you don't mind me asking, I see that we could make the substitution right from the start, why would you do so only after subtracting both sides of the equation by 1?:confused:
 
anemone said:
Well done, kaliprasad! :)

But, if you don't mind me asking, I see that we could make the substitution right from the start, why would you do so only after subtracting both sides of the equation by 1?:confused:

It is not required. I did it to make the RHS simpler but it did not help :o
 
kaliprasad said:
It is not required. I did it to make the RHS simpler but it did not help :o

I see. Thanks for the reply, kali!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K