MHB Solve Factoring Problem: (x+y)^2+2(X+Y)+1

  • Thread starter Thread starter caligari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factoring
caligari
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The problem is
(x+y)^2+2(X+Y)+1

and the answer is supposed to be (X+1+Y)^2

I looked it up on this calculator but the second step makes no sense. First I do not know how the +2 disappears and where the extra (X+Y) come from. Also it's explanation when you click on the black box doesn't make sense. It says "For a quadratic equation of the form ax2+bx+c find u,v such that: u(v)=a(c) and u+v=c.
What are u and c and also in the next step it shows it as this
((x+y)+1))((x+y)^2+(x+y)) If the hint tells me to put it in ax2+bx+c then why are there only two terms in this. THis step makes no sense.
Here is the link to the calculator and problem

https://www.symbolab.com/solver/abs...right)^{2}+2\left(x+y\right)+1/?origin=button
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, caligari! :D

We are given to factor:

$$(x+y)^2+2(x+y)+1$$

Now, suppose we let $u=x+y$, and then we have:

$$u^2+2u+1$$

You should recognize this as the square of $u+1$, hence:

$$u^2+2u+1=(u+1)^2$$

And so, back-substituting for $u$, we obtain:

$$(x+y)^2+2(x+y)+1=(x+y+1)^2$$
 
caligari said:
The problem is
(x+y)^2+2(X+Y)+1
Just a quick note:

Mathematics is "case sensitive." X and x are not the same variable.

-Dan
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top