MHB Solve for a,b,c,d Solve \frac{f(-1)+f(1)}{2}=f(0) for a, b, c, d

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bushy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Bushy
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
For a cubic function $$y=f(x)$$ three points A, B and C lie on a straight line with respective coordinates (-p,f(p)),(0,f(0)) and (p,f(p)) where p is a non zero constant.

a. Show that $$\frac{f(-p)+f(p)}{2} =f(0)$$

I tried

$$\frac{f(-p)+f(p)}{2} =\frac{0}{2} = 0 = f(0)$$

That doesn't seem right

b. Let p =1 and [math]f(x) = ax^3+bx^2+cx+d [/math]

i. Show that b=0

ii. hence [math]\frac{f(-x)+f(x)}{2}=f(0)[/math]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think you meant to give the coordinates of $A,\,B,\,C$ as $(-p,f(-p)),\,(0,f(0)),\,(p,f(p))$. If the 3 points are collinear, then we can write:

$$f(\pm p)=f(0)\pm k$$

Let's let:

$$f(x)=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d$$

So, we find that:

$$f(0)=d$$

And then we must have:

$$ap^3+bp^2+cp=k$$

$$-ap^3+bp^2-cp=-k$$

Adding these two equations, we find:

$$b=0$$

And so:

$$f(x)=ax^3+cx+d$$

Then we find:

$$\frac{f(-x)+f(x)}{2}=d=f(0)$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top