Solve Hamiltonian Problem: Have Ideas on q2=Acos(q2)+Bsin(q2)+C?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kamil600
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the Hamiltonian problem defined by the equation q2=Acos(q2)+Bsin(q2)+C, using the Hamiltonian H=(1/2)*(p12 q14 + p22 q22 - 2aq1), where a, A, B, and C are constants. Participants suggest exploring canonical transformations as a potential method for solving the Hamiltonian equations, which have proven difficult to resolve through standard approaches. Additionally, the importance of calculating partial derivatives of the Hamiltonian is emphasized, although this method has also led to unsolvable equations for some users.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics and Hamiltonian equations
  • Familiarity with canonical transformations in classical mechanics
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their application in physics
  • Basic grasp of trigonometric functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research canonical transformations in Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Study the application of partial derivatives in solving Hamiltonian equations
  • Explore numerical methods for solving nonlinear equations
  • Investigate specific examples of Hamiltonian systems to understand common solution techniques
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying classical mechanics, particularly those interested in solving complex Hamiltonian problems.

kamil600
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Have you got any clues how to prove q2=Acos(q2)+Bsin(q2)+C using hamiltonian H =(1/2)*(p12 q14 + p22 q22 - 2aq1) , where a,A,B,C=const.
I've tried to solve hamiltonian eqations what let me to equations which I can't solved.
How you got any ideas solving this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could try some canonical transformation of the variables.
This is just a tip, I didnt do any calculations.. :D
 
It might be good idea, but do you have any other clues how to solve it without canonical transformation?
 
Have you tried working out any partial derivatives of your hamiltonian?
 
Yes, I tried prove it using hamiltonian equations (which are partial derivatives of hamiltonian), but always it let me to equations which I can't solve. If the quickes way to prove it is canonical transformation maby someone can tell me how to prove this problem using it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K