Solve inequality by factoring help

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the inequality x^2 + 8x + 15 > 0 by factoring it into (x+5)(x+3) > 0. The solutions derived include x > -5 and x > -3 for the positive intervals, resulting in the final solution of (-∞, -5) ∪ (-3, +∞). The conversation highlights the time-consuming nature of this method and suggests that a more straightforward approach exists, emphasizing the importance of understanding the implications of the factors in the inequality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial inequalities
  • Familiarity with factoring quadratic expressions
  • Knowledge of interval notation
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of solving polynomial inequalities through sign analysis
  • Learn about the graphical interpretation of inequalities
  • Explore alternative methods for solving inequalities, such as test point methods
  • Investigate the use of the quadratic formula for solving quadratic inequalities
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra, educators teaching polynomial inequalities, and anyone looking to improve their problem-solving skills in mathematics.

DeanBH
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
x^2 + 8x + 15 > 0 solve inequality

(X+5)(X+3)>0


x+5>0 x>-5
X+3>0 x>-3

Why is the equality for X+5>0 x<-5 ? as the answers give?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because you have two possible solutions for (x+5)(x+3)>0

the first one:

x+5>0 ; x>-5

x+3>0 ; x>-3

[tex](-5, +\propto) \cap (-3, +\propto) = (-3, +\propto)[/tex]

and the second

x+5<0 ; x<-5

x+3<0 ; x<-3

[tex](-\propto, -5) \cap (-\propto, -3) = (-\propto, -5)[/tex]

The final solution:

[tex](-\propto, -5) \cup (-3, +\propto)[/tex]

Anyway, this way is much more time-consuming... So you shouldn't use it in future.. There is much easier way...
 
Physicsissuef said:
Because you have two possible solutions for (x+5)(x+3)>0

the first one:

x+5>0 ; x>-5

x+3>0 ; x>-3

[tex](-5, +\propto) \cap (-3, +\propto) = (-3, +\propto)[/tex]

and the second

x+5<0 ; x<-5

x+3<0 ; x<-3

[tex](-\propto, -5) \cap (-\propto, -3) = (-\propto, -5)[/tex]

The final solution:

[tex](-\propto, -5) \cup (-3, +\propto)[/tex]

Anyway, this way is much more time-consuming... So you shouldn't use it in future.. There is much easier way...

you could have just said

"because if X > -5 then the first bracket will become negative and then (x+5)(x+3) wouldn't be > 0."


but ok. =P

btw : i just realized why
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K