Solve Inequality: Interval Form Answer | x ∈ [-4, 4]

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrNeWBiE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The inequality 2x + 1 ≤ 5 - x < x - 7 was solved in two parts. The first part simplifies to x ≤ 4/3, while the second part leads to x > 6. The correct interval form for the solution is (-∞, 4/3] ∪ (6, ∞). It is crucial to remember that when moving terms across inequalities, the sign must change appropriately, which was a key point of confusion in the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic inequalities
  • Knowledge of interval notation
  • Familiarity with manipulating inequalities
  • Ability to solve compound inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inequalities and how to manipulate them
  • Learn about interval notation and its applications in mathematics
  • Explore compound inequalities and their solutions
  • Practice solving similar algebraic inequalities for mastery
USEFUL FOR

Students learning algebra, educators teaching inequality concepts, and anyone looking to improve their skills in solving and expressing inequalities in interval form.

MrNeWBiE
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Solve the inequality and write your answer in interval form.

2x+1 <= 5- x < x-7


The Attempt at a Solution



fist part 2x+1 <= 5- x
-4 <= -x
4 >= x

second part

5- x < x-7
0<-12 ,,,,,,,,,, O,O how it's gone be like this ?

well if it's right how i can write it in interval form ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi MrNeWBiE :smile:

(have a ≤ :wink:)
MrNeWBiE said:
fist part 2x+1 <= 5- x
-4 <= -x

5- x < x-7
0<-12

No, both these are wrong, for the same reason:

when you transfer -x across an = or ≤, you must multiply it by -1.
 
ohhhh i see it now ,,,

2x+1 ≤ 5- x

-4≤-3x

x≤4/3

5- x < x-7
-2x<-12 ...x>6

now they are right ?

yet i didn't understand you ,,,,,
 
Yup! :biggrin:

(I just meant that when you move -x across, it becomes +x, as you've done)

And now express that it interval form (you may need to use ∞). :wink:
 
(-∞,4/3]U[4/3,6) right ,,, ? or it's to ∞ not 6 ...
 
MrNeWBiE said:
(-∞,4/3]U[4/3,6) right ,,, ?

That's just (-∞,6) :rolleyes:
or it's to ∞ not 6 ...

and that's (-∞,∞). :smile:
 
i know that ,,,

but our tacher keep asking for more details ,,,,

if i write like this " (-∞,6) " he will say where is the 4/3 and the same for the other ,,, >.<
 
MrNeWBiE said:
if i write like this " (-∞,6) " he will say where is the 4/3

Yes, and that's because (-∞,6) is wrong!

Go back to x≤4/3

...x>6.
 
x>6 how it's gone be x≤4/3 ,,,

isn't 6>4/3 ,,,=p

how x > 6 then x≤4/3 ??
 
  • #10
MrNeWBiE said:
x>6 how it's gone be x≤4/3 ,,,

isn't 6>4/3 ,,,=p

how x > 6 then x≤4/3 ??

Exactly!

So that means … ? :smile:
 
  • #11
no answers maybe ...
 
  • #12
Looks like it! :smile:
 
  • #13
thx xD

sorry for wasting your time
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K