Solve Integration Problem: tan θ sec θ → (1/2)ln(3/2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the integral of the function tan θ sec θ, specifically demonstrating that ∫ tan θ sec θ dθ equals (1/2)ln(3/2) with limits from θ=0 to θ=π/6. Participants clarify the manipulation of logarithmic expressions and the correct application of trigonometric identities, particularly focusing on the relationship between tan 2θ and tan θ sec 2θ. The final expression is confirmed as correct through algebraic simplification and proper use of logarithmic properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, specifically integration techniques involving trigonometric functions.
  • Familiarity with logarithmic identities and properties.
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities, particularly the relationships between tan and sec functions.
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study integration techniques for trigonometric functions, focusing on ∫ tan θ sec θ dθ.
  • Learn about logarithmic manipulation and properties to simplify expressions effectively.
  • Explore the derivation of trigonometric identities, particularly how to express tan 2θ in terms of tan θ.
  • Practice using LaTeX for clear mathematical communication in online forums and documentation.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in mastering integration techniques involving trigonometric functions.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
421

Homework Statement


given ## tan 2θ-tan θ≡ tan θ sec 2θ## show that ##∫ tan θ sec θ dθ = (1/2 )ln (3/2)## limits are from θ= 0 to θ=π/6

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


##∫ tan 2θ-tan θ dθ ##
-(1/2 )ln cos 2θ + ln cos θ
→ ##-1/2 ln 1/2 + ln √3/2##
##= ln (√3)/2- (1/2)ln (1/2)##
ok am i correct up to this point?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone on this....
 
chwala said:
show that ##∫ tan θ sec θ dθ##
That should be sec 2θ, right?
chwala said:
##= ln (√3)/2- (1/2)ln (1/2)##
ok am i correct up to this point?
a little careless with the parentheses.
 
Yes sir sec2¤
 
chwala said:
Yes sir sec2¤
Ok. What about my other comment?
 
haruspex said:
That should be sec 2θ, right?

a little careless with the parentheses.
##ln \frac{3^1/2} 2## -##\frac1 2## ##ln\frac 1 2##
 
Last edited:
chwala said:
##ln \frac{3^1/2} 2## -##\frac1 2## ##ln\frac 1 2##
is that better? i have a problem using latex
 
chwala said:
is that better? i have a problem using latex
is this correct?
chwala said:

Homework Statement


given ## tan 2θ-tan θ≡ tan θ sec 2θ## show that ##∫ tan θ sec 2θ dθ## = ##\frac 1 2## ##ln\frac 3 2##, limits are from θ= 0 to θ=π/6

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


##∫ tan 2θ-tan θ dθ ##
-##\frac 1 2## ln cos 2θ + ln cos θ
 
Last edited:
chwala said:
is that better? i have a problem using latex
Yes, but all you needed to do was to correct from this:
##= ln (√3)/2- (1/2)ln (1/2)##
to
##= ln ((√3)/2)- (1/2)ln (1/2)##
so as to distinguish it from
##= (ln (√3))/2- (1/2)ln (1/2)##
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
Yes, but all you needed to do was to correct from this:
##= ln (√3)/2- (1/2)ln (1/2)##
to
##= ln ((√3)/2)- (1/2)ln (1/2)##
so as to distinguish it from
##= (ln (√3))/2- (1/2)ln (1/2)##
now how is this equal to ## \frac 1 2## ln##\frac 3 2##?
 
  • #11
chwala said:
now how is this equal to ## \frac 1 2## ln##\frac 3 2##?
Just a bit of manipulation. How else could you write ln(√3)?
 
  • #12
i am getting ##\frac 1 2## ln 3-ln 2 - (##\frac 1 2## ln 1 - ##\frac 1 2##ln 2)
which gives me ##\frac1 2## ln 3- ln 2 - ##\frac 1 2##ln 1 +##\frac 1 2## ln2
this becomes ##\frac 1 2##ln 3 + ##\frac 1 2##ln 2 - ln 2
this becomes
##\frac 12##ln 3 +ln##\frac {2^1/2} 2##
##\frac 1 2##ln 3 + ln ##{2^-1/2}##
##\frac 1 2##ln 3 - ##\frac 1 2## ln 2
##\frac 1 2##ln ##\frac 3 2##

is this now correct? greetings from Africa...
 
Last edited:
  • #13
chwala said:
i am getting ##\frac 1 2## ln 3-ln 2 - (##\frac 1 2## ln 1 - ##\frac 1 2##ln 2)
which gives me ##\frac1 2## ln 3- ln 2 - ##\frac 1 2##ln 1 +##\frac 1 2## ln2
this becomes ##\frac 1 2##ln 3 + ##\frac 1 2##ln 2 - ln 2
this becomes
##\frac 12##ln 3 +ln##\frac {2^1/2} 2##
##\frac 1 2##ln 3 + ln ##{2^-1/2}##
##\frac 1 2##ln 3 - ##\frac 1 2## ln 2
##\frac 1 2##ln ##\frac 3 2##

is this now correct? greetings from Africa...
Yes, but you can get there a little faster.
##\frac 1 2##ln 2 - ln 2=##-\frac 1 2##ln 2
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K