Solve Lagrange Multiplier Mystery: ∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj = ∂N/∂Nj=0

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Lagrange multipliers in the context of constrained optimization, specifically addressing the derivatives of the constraints Σ{Ni}=N and Σ{NiEi}=total energy. The key conclusion is that while ∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj equals 1 when i=j, ∂N/∂Nj equals 0 due to N being a constant. This leads to the interpretation that the variables are not independent, as a constraint implies interdependence among them, contradicting the assumption of independence in differentiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrange multipliers
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of constrained optimization
  • Basic concepts of energy conservation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Lagrange multipliers in optimization problems
  • Learn about the implications of constraints in multivariable calculus
  • Explore examples of constrained optimization in physics
  • Review the concept of independence in calculus and its implications for differentiation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with optimization problems involving constraints, particularly those interested in the practical applications of Lagrange multipliers.

kidsasd987
Messages
142
Reaction score
4
Hi, I have a question about lagrange multiplier

Let's say we are given with the following constraints

Σ{Ni}=N and Σ{NiEi}=total energy. N and total energy are constants by definition.
if we take the derivative with respect to Nj,

∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj=∂N/∂Nj
where i=j, ∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj=1 and ∂N/∂Nj = 0 because N is constant.

On slide 14, it says ∂N/∂Nj = 0 while ∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj=1 with the preceding constraint Σ{Ni}=N.
Then, we can conclude

∂Σ{Ni}/∂Nj= ∂N/∂Nj=0.

This is quite ambiguous to me.
if we assume we have a constraint x1+x2+x3..+xn=const.

partial of this constraint with respect to xj will be 1=0 therefore it is contradiction.
how shoud I interpret this?
 

Attachments

  • 스크린샷 2016-11-29 오후 12.40.40.png
    스크린샷 2016-11-29 오후 12.40.40.png
    71.6 KB · Views: 498
  • 스크린샷 2016-11-29 오후 12.40.37.png
    스크린샷 2016-11-29 오후 12.40.37.png
    71.3 KB · Views: 500
  • 스크린샷 2016-11-29 오후 12.44.39.png
    스크린샷 2016-11-29 오후 12.44.39.png
    51.2 KB · Views: 503
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A constraint means that your variables are not independent from each other. So when I have ## x_1+x_2+\dots+x_n=const ##, it means when I decrease one of the ##x##s, another increases to maintain the constant. But the way you differentiate it, you assume they're independent variables which is a wrong assumption.
 
ShayanJ said:
A constraint means that your variables are not independent from each other. So when I have ## x_1+x_2+\dots+x_n=const ##, it means when I decrease one of the ##x##s, another increases to maintain the constant. But the way you differentiate it, you assume they're independent variables which is a wrong assumption.

hmm I get it thanks .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K