Solve Momentum Question: 2000 kg Hammer and 400 kg Stake

  • Thread starter Thread starter Firestrider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a 2000 kg hammer striking a 400 kg stake, focusing on the concepts of momentum and energy in a completely inelastic collision. Participants explore the calculations related to the final velocities and forces involved after the collision.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of momentum conservation and kinetic energy calculations in the context of an inelastic collision. There are questions about the correct use of initial and final velocities, as well as the interpretation of energy changes during the collision.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various calculations and questioning the assumptions made in the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of kinetic energy and momentum, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or final answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of the original problem statement and express confusion over the definitions and implications of inelastic collisions, particularly regarding energy dissipation and the treatment of combined mass after the collision.

Firestrider
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
My teacher showed me a question he was confused on with a picture so I don't know the original word problem, so I'll make one up: A 2000 kg hammer strikes a 400 kg stake into the ground. The velocity of the hammer is 6 meters per second and the stake goes into the ground .75 meters. What is the velocity of the stake after the hammer strikes it and what is the resistant force? This is a completely inelastic collision.

This is what I did:

[tex]m_{1}v_{1} + m_{2}v_{2} = m_{1}v_{1}' + m_{2}v_{2}'[/tex]

[tex]v_{1}' = v_{2}'[/tex]

[tex]v_{2}' = \frac{m_{1}v_{1} + m_{2}v_{2}}{m_{1} + m_{2}}[/tex]

[tex]v_{2}' = \frac{2000(6) + 400(0)}{2000 + 400}[/tex]

[tex]v_{2}' = 5 m/s[/tex]

[tex]\Delta W = Fd[/tex]

[tex]\Delta W = \Delta PE + \Delta KE[/tex]

[tex]\Delta KE = \frac{1}{2}mv^2[/tex]

[tex]\Delta KE_{hammer} = \frac{1}{2}2000*(6)^2 = 36000 J[/tex]

[tex]\Delta PE = mgh[/tex]

[tex]\Delta PE_{stake} = 400*9.8*.75 = 2940 J[/tex]

[tex]\Delta W = 36000 + 2940 = 38940 J[/tex]

[tex]F = \frac{\Delta W}{d}[/tex]

[tex]F = \frac{38940}{.75}[/tex]

[tex]F = 51,920 N[/tex]

That's what I got, but it isn't the right answer, what am I doing wrong here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh you I forgot to put that this is a completely inelastic collision.
 
If [itex]v'_{1} = v'_{2}[/itex], then this implies that the hammer and the stake combine to become one object after the collision. Therefore to calculate the kinetic energy you need to use the sum of the masses of the hammer and stake. I am also confused to why you have used the velocity of six [itex]m\cdot s^{-1}[/itex] when you've just calculated to be 5 [itex]m\cdot s^{-1}[/itex]?
 
Oh I was using the velocity of the hammer before it hit the stake to get kinetic energy. Should I take the sum of kinetic energy of the hammer & stake after the collision plus potential energy of the stake before the collision to find the work? I probably worded my question wrong.

Would it be correct to say that for the hammer to completely stop after the collision it would have to be going 30 m/s?
 
Last edited:
Firestrider said:
Would it be correct to say that for the hammer to completely stop after the collision it would have to be going 30 m/s?

Yep, that sounds about right.
 
Firestrider said:
Oh I was using the velocity of the hammer before it hit the stake to get kinetic energy. Should I take the sum of kinetic energy of the hammer & stake after the collision plus potential energy of the stake before the collision to find the work? I probably worded my question wrong.

You've found the velocity of the combined body, because it stated that [itex]v'_{1} = v'_{2}[/itex]

So you know that the kinetic energy upon collision is given by;

[tex]E_{k} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{1}{2} (6000+400) v'_{2}^{2}[/tex]
 
Ok I get 30000J for the sum of the kinetic energies and subtract 2940J potential energy. 27060/.75 = 36,080N. But that is not what the book says.

I'm confused on the label you used: [tex]m\cdot s^{-1}[/tex] is that worded " meters in one second ". Then how would you word [tex]m\cdot s[/tex] ? I don't get why you would use " inverse seconds "
 
Last edited:
What answer does the book give? Working it out I get about 169kN.
 
The answer in the book gives 64kN
 
  • #10
What if you assume the hammer become stationary after the collision?

[tex]m\cdot s^{-1} = \frac{m}{s}[/tex]

Which is metres per second. :smile:
 
  • #11
I get 240kN if the hammer becomes stationary after collision.
 
  • #12
Firestrider said:
The answer in the book gives 64kN

I get 63520 N so it must be right.

You just have to take into account the motion of both stake and hammer after the collison. In the kinetic energy and in mgh, use mass= total mass.
Then it works out.

Patrick
 
  • #13
nrqed said:
I get 63520 N so it must be right.

You just have to take into account the motion of both stake and hammer after the collison. In the kinetic energy and in mgh, use mass= total mass.
Then it works out.

Patrick

Correction, I get the same as you 63544N. I was looking at another thread in which the mass of an object was 6000kg, so I was using 6000kg instead of 2000kg :blushing: .

Just to clarify for the OP;

[tex]WD = \frac{1}{2}\Sigma m \cdot v'_{2}^{2} + \Sigma m \cdot gh[/tex]

Sorry about the confusion.

-Hoot:smile:
 
  • #14
Do you have the correct answer now firestrider?
 
  • #15
Ok thanks for all the help. That's what I got too. But why don't I have to take in account the kinetic energy of the hammer before the collision?
 
  • #16
You stated that the collision is totally inelastic, which means the kinetic energy of the objects is not conserved, however, momentum is always conserved. Basically, you could split the question up into three sections. You took the velocity of the hammer into account when you used momentum, you can't use energy because the collision isn't elastic.

Does that make sense?
 
  • #17
Firestrider said:
Ok thanks for all the help. That's what I got too. But why don't I have to take in account the kinetic energy of the hammer before the collision?


Because when the collision occurs, some energy is dissipated in heat and used to deform the objects, etc. This is an inelastic collision, so kinetic energy is not conserved (you actually have all the numbers to calculate the change of kinetic energy during the collision...that number corresponds to energy dissipated in the forms I mentioned above). You have to start from the total kinetic energy [itex]after[/itex] the collision and work from there.

Patrick

EDIT: After posting I saw that Hootenanny had basically said the same thing.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
15K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K