Solve Physics Problem: Finding Water Pipe Direction Without Cutting

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem regarding how to determine the direction of water flow in a pipe without cutting it. Participants explore various theoretical and practical methods to solve this problem, including concepts from fluid dynamics and sound transmission.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest using a Doppler ultrasound device to measure the flow direction.
  • One approach involves using the Doppler effect and spectroscopy by directing lasers at different angles to measure spectral line displacement.
  • Another participant proposes measuring pipe diameters at two distant points to infer flow direction based on pressure drop.
  • A method involving heating the pipe and monitoring temperature differences at both ends is also mentioned, with the idea that water flow may influence heat flow direction.
  • One participant suggests banging the pipe and measuring sound at either end to detect a Doppler effect, although they note potential complications with sound transmission through the pipe.
  • A more hands-on approach is proposed by following the pipe to its source or drain to determine flow direction.
  • Another participant mentions that measuring the height of the pipe at both ends could indicate flow direction, based on the assumption that water flows downward.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of pressurized water systems, which can allow water to flow in various directions, contrasting with gravity-fed systems.
  • One participant suggests freezing the pipe to create a blockage, allowing for identification of which side contains water based on sound transmission.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of methods and opinions, with no consensus reached on a single solution. Different approaches are debated, and assumptions about water flow in pressurized versus gravity systems lead to differing viewpoints.

Contextual Notes

Some methods depend on specific conditions, such as the transparency of the pipe or the type of water system in use. The discussion also highlights the limitations of certain techniques, such as sound transmission through different media.

havaliza
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Here is a problem from a physics contest of two years ago. I've translated it from Persian but it might have some problems because of my lack of good English.

Problem:
Assume a water pipe is in the middle room and the water is going through it. How can we find out the direction of water without cutting the pipe?​

Could anyone help me to solve it?

P.S. Is "water is going through it" correct? What do you call it in English?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
havaliza said:
Problem:
Assume a water pipe is in the middle room and the water is going through it. How can we find out the direction of water without cutting the pipe?​
What can we use? Doppler ultrasound device?
 
I think I understand.

You can measure the flow of water from a distance by using the Doppler effect and spectroscopy. If you direct one laser perpendicular through the pipe, and another at, say, 60 degree angle from perpendicular, you can compare the absorption of the laser and calculate the velocity. This is because when there is a net flow of the fluid, the position of the spectral line is displaced- comparison of the two lines will give you the velocity.
 
Is the pipe transparent?

If not, we can measure the pipe diameters at two distant points. Due to pressure drop the downstream diameter will be smaller. The diameter difference will be small but still much larger than the Plank length.:wink:
 
Last edited:
Build a fire underneath the middle of the pipe and monitor the temperature at the two ends. The water flow should add a slight preferential direction to the heat flow.
 
bang the pipe in the middle and measure the sound at either end, there should be a doppler effect due to movement of the water.
the problem with this is that some (most?) of the sound will be transmitted through the pipe and not the water, but there should still be a different in the sound at either end if the equipment was sensitive enough

I wonder if you could improve the technique by instead of banging, you could perhaps generate a specific type of sound that had harmonics with the water and not the pipe, although I appreciate that sound transmital has possibly nothing to do with harmonics, and perhaps more the density of the medium?...
 
WOW!
I would never have though that i will get such nice answers!
thank y'all!
 
I might be reconfirming my status as something of a moron, but I would just follow the pipe to see where the hell it goes. You need only trace one way, because it will end as either a source or a drain, and you will then know the direction of flow.
The math stuff was pretty cool, but since I never finished high-school I tend to take a more 'hands-on' approach to things.
 
Hi there,

I might see the problem way to simple, but normally water flows downward. Therefore, you just need to measure the height of the pipe at both ends of the room.

Cheers
 
  • #10
fatra2 said:
Hi there,

I might see the problem way to simple, but normally water flows downward. Therefore, you just need to measure the height of the pipe at both ends of the room.

Cheers

To get water to flow uphill all we would need to do is raise the resevoir of the water's source higher than any segment of the pipeline. Then we can orient the pipe in any direction and still have water pressure. It is about the height difference. Then again, we could also use artificial means of generating water pressure via a pump.
 
  • #11
Hey there, Fatra.
Your answer is quite logical but for one thing. I don't know anything about plumbing in the Middle East, but here in North America our water systems are pressurized. Water flows up, down, and sideways at equal speed. In a gravity system, your response will be correct.

edit: Well B2W, you beat me to it. And your mention of an elevated reservoir was something that I overlooked. (Kind of weird, since the house that I lived in during the early 60's had a water tower pump-fed from a well.)
 
  • #12
just thought of another, you may be able to freeze the pipe in the middle thus creating a blockage. Then it is a simple matter of identifying which side is hollow and which is full of water (a few taps should be enough to confirm it).

If you could not freeze it enough to create a complete blockage, the flow will probably be effected enough to measure the difference somehow anyway
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K