How to Prove the (k+1) Step in PMI?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sahilmm15
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the inequality ##2n + 7 > (n + 3)^2## using mathematical induction and alternative methods. It is established that induction is not necessary for this proof; instead, a proof by contradiction is recommended. The participants emphasize the importance of clearly presenting mathematical problems, as illegible images hinder effective assistance. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in problem statements and the preferred methods for proof in mathematical contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with proof by contradiction
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of inequalities and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in depth
  • Learn about proof by contradiction techniques
  • Practice algebraic expansions and simplifications
  • Explore common inequalities and their proofs
USEFUL FOR

Students in mathematics, educators teaching algebra, and anyone interested in mastering proof techniques in mathematical reasoning.

sahilmm15
Messages
100
Reaction score
27
I am stuck at the problem. Can't find out what to do next for proving for (k+1). Can you help me. Thanks[Moderator's note: moved from a technical forum.]
 

Attachments

  • 16085608423001799109626063245386.jpg
    16085608423001799109626063245386.jpg
    42.9 KB · Views: 164
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
etotheipi said:
Is it only for natural numbers? Why do you need induction, can't you just multiply out the bracket?
Only for natural numbers.
 
What is the actual problem statement? The image you uploaded is almost impossible to read. As far as I can tell, it looks like you are to prove that ##2n + 7 > (n + 3)^2##.

You don't need induction to prove this. You can do a proof by contradiction. I.e., assume that ##2n + 7 \le (n + 3)
^2##. Expand the right side and from there get a contradiction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
Mark44 said:
What is the actual problem statement? The image you uploaded is almost impossible to read. As far as I can tell, it looks like you are to prove that ##2n + 7 > (n + 3)^2##.

You don't need induction to prove this. You can do a proof by contradiction. I.e., assume that ##2n + 7 \le (n + 3)
^2##. Expand the right side and from there get a contradiction.
You read the problem right. Thanks for the answer.
 
sahilmm15 said:
You read the problem right.
Well, lucky for me. The image you posted was nearly unreadable, which is why we ask that members posting homework problems type the equations or inequalities rather than post an image of their work. It's very rare that someone posts an image that can easily be read. Most images are unreadable due to illegible writing or poor lighting of the work being photographed, or a combination of the two.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K