MHB Solve Polynomial Division: -5a + 4b = x^2+1 Rem -A-2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
The remainder of $$p(x)=x^3+ax^2+4bx-1$$ divided by $$x^2+1$$ is –5a + 4b. If the remainder of p(x) divided by x + 1 is –a – 2, the value of 8ab is ...
A. $$-\frac34$$
B. $$-\frac12$$
C. 0
D. 1
E. 3

Dividing p(x) by $$x^2+1$$ by $$x^2+1$$ with –5a + 4b as the remainder using long division, I got (4bx – 1) – ((a – 1)x + a – 1) = –5a + 4b, thus (4b – a + 1)x + a = –5a + 4b. Does this mean that 4b – a + 1 = 0 since the right hand doesn't have an x term? Or do I need to look for the value of x first? I'm at a loss here.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
yes. 4b – a + 1 = 0 as there is no x term.
you need to divide by x+1 and get the constant term (putting x = -1 shall do also)
this shall give 2 equations and you need to solve and proceed further;
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top