Solve Quantum Mechanics: Probability of Spin-1/2 Particle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving quantum mechanics problems related to the probability of measuring the spin of a spin-1/2 particle. Participants analyze the spin-1/2 operator \hat{S} and the normalized eigenvectors \vert{\psi_\pm}\rangle in terms of \vert{+z}\rangle and \vert{-z}\rangle. The probability of measuring the spin projection along two different unit vectors, \vec{n_1} and \vec{n_2}, is derived using the formula P=\frac{1}{2}(1+\vec{n_1}\cdot\vec{n_2}). The discussion highlights the confusion regarding the interpretation of measurement projections and the mathematical representation of the spin states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically spin-1/2 systems.
  • Familiarity with the mathematical representation of quantum states using Dirac notation.
  • Knowledge of unit vectors and their role in quantum measurements.
  • Proficiency in trigonometric functions and their application in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of eigenstates for spin-1/2 particles in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of measurement in quantum mechanics, particularly the projection postulate.
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of quantum states using Bloch spheres.
  • Investigate the concept of quantum entanglement and its relation to spin measurements.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists working with spin systems, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum measurements.

ProjectionSpin
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Quantum Mechanics Help [Probability of a Spin-1/2 Particle]

Part 1) \hat{S} is a spin-1/2 operator, \vec n is a unit vector, \vert{\psi_\pm}\rangle are normalized eigenvectors of n\cdot\hat{S} with eigenvectors \pm\frac12. Write \vert{\psi_\pm}\rangle in terms of \vert{+z}\rangle and \vert{-z}\rangle.

Part 2) \vec n_1 and \vec n_2 are unit vectors. A measurement found the projection of spin-1/2 on the direction \vec n_1 to be 1/2. Use the results of the previous part to show that a subsequent measurement of the projection of spin on the direction \vec n_2 will give 1/2 with probability

P=\frac12(1+\vec n_1\cdot\vec n_2)







The attempt at a solution
First I declare what my normal vector \vec n will be, \vec n = (sin\theta\cos\phi,\ \sin\theta\sin\phi,\ \cos\theta)

I then solve for \sum_i\vec n\cdot\hat{S}_i and started looking for the eigenstates, which lead to

\mu=\pm 1

Setting this up lead me to
\langle -z\vert\psi_+\rangle=-e^{i\phi}\frac{\cos\theta-1}{\sin\theta}\langle+z\vert\psi_+\rangle
which, after normalizing, I then find
\vert\psi_+\rangle=\cos\frac\theta2\vert+z\rangle+e^{-i\phi}\sin\frac\theta2\vert-z\rangle

Likewise, when I use \mu=-1 I find

\vert\psi_-\rangle=\sin\frac\theta2\vert+z\rangle-e^{i\phi}\cos\frac\theta2\vert-z\rangle

**This officially marks the end of part 1**

For part 2, I assumed that "the projection of spin-1/2 on the direction n⃗ 1 to be 1/2" was equivalent to
\langle \vec n\vert\vec n_1\rangle=\frac12

But supposably this is not the case, which leaves me to just being confused on where to go.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ProjectionSpin said:
For part 2, I assumed that "the projection of spin-1/2 on the direction n⃗ 1 to be 1/2" was equivalent to
\langle \vec n\vert\vec n_1\rangle=\frac12
There is no ##\vec{n}## in part b. The problem mentions the measurement of the projection of the spin in the direction of ##\vec{n}_1##. How do you translate that into mathematical terms?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K