Quantum Zeno Effect and Evolution Operator Properties

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Quantum Zeno Effect and the properties of the evolution operator defined as ##U_t = e^{-iHt/\hbar}##, associated with the Hamiltonian ##H##. Participants demonstrate that the expression $$\underbrace{PU_{t/n}P\dots PU_{t/n}}_{n\text{ times}}P = \langle \phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle ^n P$$ holds true through proof by induction. Additionally, they derive that $$\langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle ^n = e^{-i\langle H\rangle t/\hbar}(1+\mathcal{O}(t^2/n))$$, confirming the relationship between the expectation value and the evolution operator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically the concepts of Hamiltonians and evolution operators.
  • Familiarity with the Quantum Zeno Effect and its implications in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of projection operators and their mathematical representations in quantum mechanics.
  • Proficiency in Taylor series expansions and their applications in quantum state calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Quantum Zeno Effect in quantum computing and measurement theory.
  • Explore advanced topics in quantum mechanics, such as the role of Hamiltonians in time evolution.
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of projection operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the use of Taylor series in quantum state evolution and perturbation theory.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and students studying advanced quantum theory will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the mathematical properties of evolution operators and their applications in quantum systems.

Markus Kahn
Messages
110
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


Let ##U_t = e^{-iHt/\hbar}## be the evolution operator associated with the Hamiltonian ##H##, and let ##P=\vert\phi\rangle\langle \phi\vert## be the projector on some normalized state vector ##\vert \phi\rangle##.

Show that
$$\underbrace{PU_{t/n}P\dots PU_{t/n}}_{n\text{ times}}P = \langle \phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle ^n P$$
and that
$$\langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle ^n = e^{-i\langle H\rangle t/\hbar}(1+\mathcal{O}(t^2/n))$$

Homework Equations


All given above.

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first eq. I wrote out
$$\begin{align*}\langle \phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle^n &= \langle \phi\vert U_{t/n}\underbrace{\vert\phi\rangle \langle\phi\vert}_{=P} U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle \dots \langle \phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle\\
&= \langle \phi\vert U_{t/n} \underbrace{P\dots PU_{t/n}}_{n-1\text{ times}}\vert\phi\rangle .\end{align*}$$
I'm not sure how this is supposed to add up since the last ket in the last eq. is just not there in the expression that we want.

For the second equation we can expand
$$U_{t/n} = e^{-iHt/n\hbar} = 1 -\frac{it}{n\hbar} H+ \mathcal{O}(t^2/n^2).$$
The problem arises when I try to calculate the expectation value:
$$\begin{align*}\langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert \phi\rangle &= \left\langle \phi\Bigg\vert 1 -\frac{it}{n\hbar} H+ \mathcal{O}(t^2/n^2)\Bigg\vert\phi\right\rangle\\
&=1-\frac{it}{n\hbar} \langle H\rangle+ \langle\mathcal{O}(t^2/n^2)\rangle ,\end{align*}$$
but this seems quite wrong. I'm not really sure where the error exactly happened...

Hope someone can help a bit.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I was able to figure out how to do the first part of the question:
We want to prove that for ##U_{t/n}## defined as above
$$
\underbrace{PU_{t/n}P\dots PU_{t/n}}_{n\text{ times}}P = \langle \phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle ^n P
$$
holds.

Proof by induction:
  • ##n=1##: ##PU_{t/n}P=\vert\phi\rangle \langle\phi\vert U_{t/n} \vert\phi\rangle\langle\phi\vert = \langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle \vert\phi\rangle\langle\phi\vert = \langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle P##
  • Assume that the statement is true for ##n\in\mathbb{N}##.
  • ##n+1##: $$\begin{align*}\underbrace{PU_{t/n}P\dots PU_{t/n}}_{n+1\text{ times}}P &= PU_{t/n}\underbrace{PU_{t/n}P\dots PU_{t/n}}_{n\text{ times}}P = PU_{t/n}\langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle ^n P\\ &=\langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle ^nPU_{t/n}P = \langle\phi\vert U_{t/n}\vert\phi\rangle ^{n+1} P\end{align*}$$
I hope this works... Regarding the second part of the question, well I'm still completely clueless.
 
Got a solution to the problem (not my own):
The first part of the problem works just as I showed above. For the second part one can proceed like this:
$$\begin{aligned} \left\langle \phi \left| U _ { t / n } \right| \phi \right\rangle ^ { n } & = \left( \exp \left( - \frac { i ( t / n ) } { \hbar } \langle H \rangle \right) \left( 1 + \mathcal { O } \left( t ^ { 2 } / n ^ { 2 } \right) \right) \right) ^ { n } \\ & = \exp \left( - \frac { i t } { \hbar } \langle H \rangle \right) \left( 1 + \mathcal { O } \left( t ^ { 2 } / n ^ { 2 } \right) \right) ^ { n } \end{aligned}$$
Now one can expand ##\left( 1 + \mathcal { O } \left( t ^ { 2 } / n ^ { 2 } \right) \right) ^ { n } = 1 + n \mathcal { O } \left( t ^ { 2 } / n ^ { 2 } \right) = 1 + \mathcal { O } \left( t ^ { 2 } / n \right)##, so we find
$$\left\langle \phi \left| U _ { t / n } \right| \phi \right\rangle ^ { n } = \exp \left( - \frac { i t } { \hbar } \langle H \rangle \right) \left( 1 + \mathcal { O } \left( t ^ { 2 } / n \right) \right) .$$
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K