Solve Repeated Eigenvalues: X' = [[9,4,0], [-6,-1,0], [6,4,3]] * X

  • Thread starter Thread starter XianForce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the differential equation X' = [[9, 4, 0], [-6, -1, 0], [6, 4, 3]] * X using eigenvalues. The characteristic equation reveals a repeated eigenvalue λ=3 with multiplicity 2 and a distinct eigenvalue λ=5. The participant correctly identifies the dependency among eigenvectors for λ=3 and proposes generating two linearly independent eigenvectors by varying k3. The consensus confirms that this method is valid, and the alternative approach using the Kteλt + Peλt form is unnecessary in this case.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Familiarity with differential equations
  • Knowledge of characteristic equations
  • Proficiency in linear algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method for finding eigenvectors for repeated eigenvalues
  • Learn about the Kteλt + Peλt solution form for differential equations
  • Explore applications of eigenvalues in systems of differential equations
  • Review linear algebra techniques for solving linear systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, engineering, or physics who are solving systems of differential equations, particularly those involving repeated eigenvalues.

XianForce
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve X' = [ [9, 4, 0], [-6, -1, 0], [6, 4, 3]] * X using eigenvalues.


Homework Equations


(A - λI) * K = 0
X = eλt


The Attempt at a Solution


Set up the characteristic equation to find eigenvalues. I found a root of multiplicity 2 of λ=3 and another distinct root λ=5.

When setting up equations to solve for the eigenvectors (setting λ= 3) I found:

6k1 + 4k2 = 0
-6k1 -4k2 = 0
6k1 + 4k2 = 0

So there's only a dependency for k1 and k2. So can't I simply find two linearly independent eigenvectors by substituting different values for k3 such as [2, -3, 1] and [2, -3, 2] and use those as two independent solutions? Or does this mean I still have to walk through the steps of using the Kteλt + Peλt form of the solution to find the second solution for the λ=3 root?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Your first method is the right one.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
15K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K