Solve simultaneous equations with logarithms

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter footprints
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simultaneous equations
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
21 replies · 3K views
footprints
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
Sovle the simultaneous equations
[tex]log_2 (x-14y) = 3[/tex]
[tex]lgx - lg(y+1) = 1[/tex]
How do i start?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
for the first equation, make it

[tex]2^3= x-14y[/tex]

then carry on from there...

:smile:
 
Of course, without knowing what "lg" means we can't help you with the second equation!
 
I suppose lg means [tex]log_{10} ?[/tex] I got the question from my book.
 
Last edited:
Weird. I'm most familiar with lg denoting log base two, from my computer science courses.
 
Well u might be correct considering that u are probably smarter than me. But i was thaught that lg is [tex]log_{10}[/tex] if the base isn't stated.
 
lg is used, for example in certain fluid mechanics formulae, as the Briggsian logarithm, that is, [tex]log_{10}[/tex]
 
The answer for the question is x=15, y=1/2
 
Since you've learned to use "lg" as log10, stick with that!
The second equation can then be rewritten as:
[tex]\frac{x}{y+1}=10[/tex]
Do you agree with that reasoning?
 
How about this one. Solve 1 + 2 lg (x+1) = lg (2x+1) + lg (5x+8)
Sorry but i still haven't got the hang of log yet
 
Look first at your RIGHT-HAND side:
Can you write the sum of two logs as a single log?
 
ok so i got [tex]lg(10x^2 + 21x + 8)[/tex]
Then i will get [tex]10+(x+1)^2 = (10x^2 + 21x + 8)[/tex]right?
 
Right, so you can use that expression as your right-hand side instead (agreed?).
Now, consider the 2lg(x+1)-term on your original left-hand side.
Can you rewrite that into log(something..)
 
No, your suggestion at exponentiating the equation is wrong, even though you made a correct rewriting of your right-hand side
 
Last edited:
Isn't the left hand side in a log form already? Except the 1.
 
It is completely wrong:
We have:
[tex]1+lg((x+1)^{2})=lg(...)[/tex]
We must move the log term on the left-hand side over and get:
[tex]1=lg(\frac{(...)}{(x+1)^{2}})[/tex]
Or :
[tex]10=\frac{(...)}{(x+1)^{2}}[/tex]

Do you see the difference?

I've used (...) to denote what stood on the right-hand side.
 
Ahhh... Finally i get it. I can solve it from here.
 
Last edited:
What notation you use for logarythms in base "e" and in base "10"? In Spain we use "ln" for the first, and "log" for second. I think that your notation is not the same...
 
Same for me in my country
 
I would do 1 + 2 lg (x+1) = lg (2x+1) + lg (5x+8)
by rewriting it as lg(2x+1)+ lg(5x+8)- 2log(x+1)= 1 so
lg((2x+1)(5x+1)/(x+1)2)= 1 which is the same as

[tex]\frac{(2x+1)(5x+1)/(x+1)^2}= 10[/tex]
or
[tex](2x+1)(5x+1)= 10(x+1)^2[/tex]
which is
[tex]10x^2+7x+ 1= 10x<sup>2</sup>+ 20x+ 10[/tex]
so
[tex]-13x= 9[/tex]
 
Halls: It is (5x+8) rather than (5x+1)..