Solve the homogeneous ODE: dy/dx = (x^2 + y^2)/xy

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homogeneous Ode
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the homogeneous ordinary differential equation dy/dx = (x^2 + y^2)/xy and the placement of constants after integration. It is established that the constant can be expressed as either ln k or ln (1/k) without affecting the derived formula for v, as initial conditions will yield the same results despite differing constant values. A preference is noted for using definite integrals to incorporate initial conditions, which also helps manage dimensions in physics-related problems. The method presented leads to a clear expression for v in terms of x and initial conditions. Overall, the placement of the constant is flexible and does not impact the final outcome when initial conditions are applied.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415
Homework Statement
kindly see attached below:
Relevant Equations
##y=vx##
1625014099464.png

1625014177894.png


this is pretty easy for me to solve, no doubt on that. My question is on the constant. Alternatively, is it correct to have,
##ln x= \frac {v^2}{2}##+ C, then work it from there...
secondly, we are 'making" ##c= ln k##, is it for convenience purposes?, supposing i left the constant as it is, would that be wrong?
##ln x= \frac {v^2}{2}##+ C
##ln x-c= \frac {v^2}{2}##
##2[ln x-c]=v^2##
##2x^2[ln x-c]=y^2## would this be correct?...the question that i am trying to ask is, does it matter where one places the constant after integration.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No it doesn't matter where you put the constant neither if you set it equal to ##\ln k## or ##\ln \frac{1}{k}##, because given an initial condition you will get the same formula for v in both cases, but the exact value of the constants will be different (for example if you find k=2 for the one case, you ll find k=1/2 for the other case).
 
Delta2 said:
No it doesn't matter where you put the constant neither if you set it equal to ##\ln k## or ##\ln \frac{1}{k}##, because given an initial condition you will get the same formula for v in both cases, but the exact value of the constants will be different (for example if you find k=2 for the one case, you ll find k=1/2 for the other case).
nice delta :cool:
 
My personal preference is to insert the initial conditions explicitly by doing definite integrals
$$\int_{v_0}^v v~dv=\int_{x_0}^x \frac{1}{x}~dx$$ $$\frac{1}{2}\left(v^2-v_0^2\right)=\ln\left(\frac{x}{x_0}\right) \implies v=\pm \sqrt{ 2\left[v_0^2+ \ln\left(\frac{x}{x_0}\right)\right]}.$$If the equation is related to a physics problem, this method takes care of the dimensions automatically.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link and chwala
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...