Undergrad Solve the problem involving Rings

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving polynomial equations and understanding the properties of rings, particularly in relation to the polynomial (x+1)^3. Participants explore the relationship between various polynomial expressions, including how to simplify and manipulate them. The conversation highlights the significance of the ideal ⟨x^2 + 1⟩ in the ring ℝ[x], noting that it is both prime and maximal, which leads to the conclusion that ℝ[x]/⟨x^2 + 1⟩ forms a field equivalent to the complex numbers. Additionally, the transformation of x^3 + 4 into a simpler form is discussed, emphasizing the role of complex numbers in these polynomial equations. The thread effectively illustrates the interplay between polynomial manipulation and ring theory concepts.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415
TL;DR
Kindly see attached (reference is highlighted part)
1690385428932.png


Its a bit clear; i can follow just to pick another polynomial say

##(x+1)^3## are we then going to have ##(2x-2)+ x+3##?

or it has to be a polynomial with

##x^2+1## being evident? cheers...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's see ...
\begin{align*}
(x+1)^3&=(x+1)^2\cdot (x+1)=2x\cdot (x+1)=2x^2+2x=2\cdot (x^2+1) -2+2x=2x-2=2\cdot (x-1)\\
&\text{crosscheck}\\
(x+1)^3&=x^3+3x^2+3x+1=x\cdot (-1)+3\cdot (-1)+3x+1=2x-2=2\cdot(x-1)
\end{align*}
We identify ##x^2=-1.##
 
...I was getting a bit lost on this line:

$$2x^2+2x=2\cdot (x^2+1) -2+2x=2x-2=2\cdot (x-1)$$

...but i now i got it by letting,

##x^2+x=x^2+1+m##

therefore

##m=x-1##

other steps follow well.
 
...which means that

##(x+1)^4=(x+1)^2 (x+1)^2 =2x ⋅2x=4x^2=4(-1)=-4##

Cross check:

##(x+1)^4=x^4+4x^3+6x^2+4x+1=1-4x-6+4x+1=-4##
 
Lastly on this just to get the drift of things, if we have a polynomial say;

##x^3+4##

then this becomes,

##x(x^2)+4=x(-1)+4=4-x##

...
 
chwala said:
Lastly on this just to get the drift of things, if we have a polynomial say;

##x^3+4##

then this becomes,

##x(x^2)+4=x(-1)+4=4-x##

...
Right. The ring ##\mathbb{R}[x] ## is an integral domain, the ideal ##\langle x^2+1 \rangle## is prime and maximal. This makes ##\mathbb{R}[x]/\langle x^2+1 \rangle ## a field, the complex numbers. So ##x= \mathrm{i}.##

Here we have ##x^3+4= \mathrm{i}^3+4=-\mathrm{i} +4 =4-x.##
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
751
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K