Undergrad Solve the problem involving Rings

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving polynomial equations and understanding the properties of rings, particularly in relation to the polynomial (x+1)^3. Participants explore the relationship between various polynomial expressions, including how to simplify and manipulate them. The conversation highlights the significance of the ideal ⟨x^2 + 1⟩ in the ring ℝ[x], noting that it is both prime and maximal, which leads to the conclusion that ℝ[x]/⟨x^2 + 1⟩ forms a field equivalent to the complex numbers. Additionally, the transformation of x^3 + 4 into a simpler form is discussed, emphasizing the role of complex numbers in these polynomial equations. The thread effectively illustrates the interplay between polynomial manipulation and ring theory concepts.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415
TL;DR
Kindly see attached (reference is highlighted part)
1690385428932.png


Its a bit clear; i can follow just to pick another polynomial say

##(x+1)^3## are we then going to have ##(2x-2)+ x+3##?

or it has to be a polynomial with

##x^2+1## being evident? cheers...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's see ...
\begin{align*}
(x+1)^3&=(x+1)^2\cdot (x+1)=2x\cdot (x+1)=2x^2+2x=2\cdot (x^2+1) -2+2x=2x-2=2\cdot (x-1)\\
&\text{crosscheck}\\
(x+1)^3&=x^3+3x^2+3x+1=x\cdot (-1)+3\cdot (-1)+3x+1=2x-2=2\cdot(x-1)
\end{align*}
We identify ##x^2=-1.##
 
...I was getting a bit lost on this line:

$$2x^2+2x=2\cdot (x^2+1) -2+2x=2x-2=2\cdot (x-1)$$

...but i now i got it by letting,

##x^2+x=x^2+1+m##

therefore

##m=x-1##

other steps follow well.
 
...which means that

##(x+1)^4=(x+1)^2 (x+1)^2 =2x ⋅2x=4x^2=4(-1)=-4##

Cross check:

##(x+1)^4=x^4+4x^3+6x^2+4x+1=1-4x-6+4x+1=-4##
 
Lastly on this just to get the drift of things, if we have a polynomial say;

##x^3+4##

then this becomes,

##x(x^2)+4=x(-1)+4=4-x##

...
 
chwala said:
Lastly on this just to get the drift of things, if we have a polynomial say;

##x^3+4##

then this becomes,

##x(x^2)+4=x(-1)+4=4-x##

...
Right. The ring ##\mathbb{R}[x] ## is an integral domain, the ideal ##\langle x^2+1 \rangle## is prime and maximal. This makes ##\mathbb{R}[x]/\langle x^2+1 \rangle ## a field, the complex numbers. So ##x= \mathrm{i}.##

Here we have ##x^3+4= \mathrm{i}^3+4=-\mathrm{i} +4 =4-x.##
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
904
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K