Solve the problem involving the velocity - time graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    equation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem involving a velocity-time graph, where simultaneous equations are used to find values for variables m and x, resulting in m=40 and x=500. The approach for part (d) involves calculating deceleration using the gradient concept, leading to the determination of y1 as 20. Participants emphasize the importance of clearly defining symbols and justifying equations for better understanding. Additionally, it is noted that the area under the velocity-time graph represents distance traveled, and proper units should be included in the answers. Overall, clarity in explanations and adherence to conventions in variable usage are highlighted as essential for effective communication in problem-solving.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
413
Homework Statement
see attached
Relevant Equations
Mechanics
1711792658609.png


For part (a)

1711796581561.png


I came up with a simultaneous equation, i.e

##m+x+4m+700##
##5m+x=700##

and

##15000=\dfrac{1}{2}[5m+2x]25##
##1200=5m+2x##

therefore on solving the simultaneous,

##5m+x=700##
##1200=5m+2x##

we get ##x=500## and ##m=40##

the ms approach is here; more less similar approach.

1711792926502.png



Part (c) is straightforward.

For part (d) i used the concept on gradient,

i have for the deceleration part,

##m =\left[ \dfrac{25-0}{540-700} \right]##

##-0.15625=\left[\dfrac{y_1 - 0}{572 - 700}\right]##

##(-0.15625) (-128) =y_1##

##y_1 = 20##.

Mark scheme approach is here for part (d)

1711793499268.png




just sharing in case there is more insight.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want people to comment on your solution, you should be more clear about what you are doing by (a) defining what the symbols you use stand for and (b) justifying the equations in which you use these symbols.

In other words explain what you are doing by placing yourself in the position of the reader.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes SammyS, erobz, MatinSAR and 1 other person
kuruman said:
If you want people to comment on your solution, you should be more clear about what you are doing by (a) defining what the symbols you use stand for and (b) justifying the equations in which you use these symbols.

In other words explain what you are doing by placing yourself in the position of the reader.
done.
 
chwala said:
done.
Not completely.

Your solution to part (b) is well organized and we can infer what the variables represent by your labelling on your graph for part (a).
It would have been good for you to indicate that the area under the velocity-time graph gives the distance traveled, and that you were using units of metes for that, and that you computed the area using the formula for area of a trapezoid.
Also, your answers should definitely include units.

For part(d):
You have previously used the variable, ##m##, for another purpose in parts (a) and (b). Besides, we have a name for this quantity, namely acceleration.

If you have made changes to the OP as a result of @kuruman 's comments, you should indicate that when you edit the OP. I know this has been pointed out on other occasions.

chwala said:
Homework Statement: see attached
Relevant Equations: Mechanics

For part (a)

View attachment 342548

I came up with a simultaneous equation, i.e

##m+x+4m+700##
##5m+x=700##

and

##15000=\dfrac{1}{2}[5m+2x]25##
##1200=5m+2x##

therefore on solving the simultaneous,

##5m+x=700##
##1200=5m+2x##

we get ##x=500## and ##m=40##

the ms approach is here; more less similar approach.

View attachment 342546


Part (c) is straightforward.

For part (d) i used the concept on gradient,

i have for the deceleration part,

##m =\left[ \dfrac{25-0}{540-700} \right]##

##-0.15625=\left[\dfrac{y_1 - 0}{572 - 700}\right]##

##(-0.15625) (-128) =y_1##

##y_1 = 20##.

Mark scheme approach is here for part (d)

View attachment 342547

just sharing in case there is more insight.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and kuruman
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top