How Do You Solve This Mysterious Number Puzzle?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter YoungPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic Puzzle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion revolves around a logic puzzle that presents a series of equations with seemingly arbitrary results. Participants analyze the underlying patterns and mathematical functions that could explain the outputs. The consensus is that the puzzle lacks a unique solution due to its ambiguous nature, with various interpretations possible. The discussion highlights the complexity of deriving a function from limited data points, emphasizing the need for additional constraints to achieve a definitive answer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic functions and equations
  • Familiarity with multivariate polynomials
  • Knowledge of mathematical logic and reasoning
  • Experience with problem-solving techniques in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of multivariate polynomial functions
  • Research methods for solving underdetermined systems of equations
  • Learn about mathematical logic and its applications in puzzles
  • Investigate the principles behind logic puzzles and code-breaking techniques
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, puzzle enthusiasts, educators, and anyone interested in logic and problem-solving methodologies will benefit from this discussion.

YoungPhysicist
Insights Author
Messages
350
Reaction score
203
A logic puzzle I just found online:
$$
5+3+2 = 151022\\
9+2+4 = 183652\\
8+6+3 = 482466\\
5+4+5 = 202541\\
7+2+5 = ? $$
143547
The first two digits are the first two numbers multiplied.
The middle two digits are the first and last number multiplied.
The last two digits are the first two digits plus the middle two digits minus the second number.
Edit: The answer to the problem is not 14.
Please post how long did the problem take you to solve:wink:
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Young physicist said:
Edit: The answer is not 14.
Agreed, it did not take me 14 seconds to solve this.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50, opus and fresh_42
berkeman said:
Agreed, it did not take me 14 seconds to solve this.
How long did it take you?
 
1 is a correct answer, that takes about 0.65 s on average: 0.5 s to grasp the kind of question, 0.15 s average reaction time.
Difficult to say how long it took @berkeman to find the pun. This varies too wide across the species. E.g. I'm bad at this and it usually takes me several thoughts.

Now do you know, why 1 is a correct answer?
 
fresh_42 said:
1 is a correct answer, that takes about 0.65 s on average: 0.5 s to grasp the kind of question, 0.15 s average reaction time.
Difficult to say how long it took @berkeman to find the pun. This varies too wide across the species. E.g. I'm bad at this and it usually takes me several thoughts.

Now do you know, why 1 is a correct answer?
Maybe the pattern can’t “hold” like the number sequence? Every answer is possible.
 
Young physicist said:
Maybe the pattern can’t “hold” like the number sequence? Every answer is possible.
I don't understand the question, but your second sentence is correct.

a) We have a code of the type ##(p,q,r;N)## with natural numbers.
b) We also have the implicit assumption that there is a function ##N=f(p,q,r)##.
c) The question is therefore: Given ##4## points of the graph of the function, what is the function value at a fifth point?

Now how many functions are out there, which have at least these four points in common?
Even if we assume, that ##f(x_1,x_2,x_3)## is a multivariate polynomial, say ##f(x_1,x_2,x_3)= \sum_{n_1+n_2+n_3=m} a_{n_1n_2n_3}x_1^{n_1}x_2^{n_2}x_3^{n_3}## then how many functions of this type satisfy finitely many given conditions ##f(p,q,r)=N##, in our case five?

Have a look at ##f(x,y)=5x^3+2xy^2-10x^2y^3+3x-4y##:
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=f(x,y)=5x^3+2xy^2-10x^2y^3+3x-4y

Now imagine such a graph with some points fixed. How many such surfaces are still possible which contain those points? We even have an additional dimension, an arbitrary high degree for our multivariate polynomial, and this special form for ##f(x_1,x_2,x_3)## has already been a deliberate restriction. Imagine if we add all trigonometric functions, exponential function, roots of any degree or whatever.
 
fresh_42 said:
1 is a correct answer, that takes about 0.65 s on average: 0.5 s to grasp the kind of question, 0.15 s average reaction time.
Difficult to say how long it took @berkeman to find the pun. This varies too wide across the species. E.g. I'm bad at this and it usually takes me several thoughts.

Now do you know, why 1 is a correct answer?

This misses the point. This could be a code. In which case, breaking the code is to find a simple pattern to the numbers. Last year someone showed me a copy of the GCHQ puzzle book.

https://www.waterstones.com/book/the-gchq-puzzle-book/gchq/9780718185541

This is the sort of puzzle you'll find in there. These puzzles do not generally involve pure mathematical proofs, but a mixture of maths, logic, abduction and general knowledge.
 
PeroK said:
This misses the point.
No. It criticizes the way it is posed##{}^*)##: Find the answer! It should read: Find all hidden assumptions! Or if you like and suggested: Break the code!
To claim there is a unique answer might be o.k. on facebook, within a mathematical context it is not.

##{}^*)## This refers to the general way those questions are asked, not the specific one by the OP.

Edit: Alternatively the question would have to be a minimum problem: Find the shortest (including the reason) answer, in which case the measure must be named and the minimality must be proven. Or the requirement ##f\, : \,\mathbb{N}^3 \longrightarrow \mathbb{N}## should be made. But then uniqueness becomes a big problem without further conditions (I guess).
 
Last edited:
If you restrict f to be of no higher degree than bilinear in p,q, and r is it true that N can be any real number?
 
  • #10
Vanadium 50 said:
If you restrict f to be of no higher degree than bilinear in p,q, and r is it true that N can be any real number?
The supposed solution isn't linear in any variable, only affine linear. If we restrict the allowed powers of ##p,q,r## to be at most ##1##, then it depends on what ##p,q,r## are allowed to be. E.g. the answer is yes, if ##r \in \mathbb{R},## although it would not necessarily contain the four points. If we restrict ##f## on integers both on domain and codomain, then we quickly get a question like FLT, and that took about ##350## years and a very persistent genius to solve.
 
  • #11
Since we are talking more about the properties of such questions than giving the intended answers, I will close the thread.
It is a fun question, but mathematically underdetermined.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K