MHB Solve Trig Word Problem: Acre Parcel Sides 180 & 240 ft

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig Word problem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a trigonometric word problem involving a one-acre parcel with sides measuring 180 ft and 240 ft that intersect at a right angle. Using the Pythagorean theorem, the length of the fourth side is calculated to be approximately 219.64 ft. The area of triangle ABD is determined to be 21,600 ft², while triangle DBC is calculated to be 21,960 ft². Although there was mention of using Heron's theorem, the participants agree that the Pythagorean method is simpler and more effective for this problem. The calculations reinforce the accuracy of the derived fourth side length.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
View attachment 4641
A one acre parcel has 2 sides 180 ft and 240 ft intersecting at a right angle.
the other side adjacent to the 180 ft is 200 ft what is the length of the 4th side.

by Pythagorean theorem $BD = 300$

so triangle ABD = $21600 \ ft^2$
thus triangle DBC = $21960 \ ft^2$

so 21960 = (1/2)(300)(h) then h=146.4

$$\sqrt{{200}^{2}{}-146.4^2}=136.26$$

$300-136.36 =163.74$

so by Pythagorean theorem $BC$ or the 4th side $\approx$ $219.64 ft$

not sure this is correct, saw another proposed way to do this
using Heron's theorem but after trying it was ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That looks good. I agree with your answer, and I don't see any simpler method for finding it.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top