Solving Vectors Word Problem: Ground Velocity of Airplane

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics4ever25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a vectors word problem involving an airplane's ground velocity affected by wind. Two methods yield different resultant velocities: Method 1 calculates 505.51 km/h, while Method 2 initially suggests 597.2 km/h due to a misinterpretation of the wind's bearing. The confusion arises from the term "from" in the wind's description, indicating a back bearing that should be adjusted to 300 degrees for accurate calculations. Ultimately, the correct resultant velocity, after correcting the bearing in Method 2, aligns with Method 1's result at 505.51 km/h. Understanding the concept of back bearing is crucial for solving such vector problems accurately.
  • #61
physics4ever25 said:
I'm a bit confused by how you found the hand on the clock. For the previous question you determined that it was around 11 and for this one you determined that it's around 2. However, I don't know how to determine this.
If the resultant vector were one of the hands on a clock, with 12 at North and 6 at South, 3 at East, and 9 at West, at what time would the resultant vector be pointing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Chestermiller said:
If the resultant vector were one of the hands on a clock, with 12 at North and 6 at South, 3 at East, and 9 at West, at what time would the resultant vector be pointing?
That's what I'm confused about. How do you determine that the resultant vector was pointing at 11 O clock for the previous question and at 2 O clock for this question.
 
  • #63
physics4ever25 said:
I'm a bit confused by how you found the hand on the clock. For the previous question you determined that it was around 11 and for this one you determined that it's around 2. However, I don't know how to determine this.
If the clock analogy doesn't work for you, forget about it. It was just another way that I thought of for looking at the direction of the resultant. It's not worth spending your valuable time trying to figure it out.
 
  • #64
Chestermiller said:
If the clock analogy doesn't work for you, forget about it. It was just another way that I thought of for looking at the direction of the resultant. It's not worth spending your valuable time trying to figure it out.
I mean in general I don't know how to find the direction of the resultant. I know how to find the missing angle in the triangle (using tan theta) but I don't know how to find the actual resultant angle (bearing).
 
  • #65
physics4ever25 said:
I mean in general I don't know how to find the direction of the resultant. I know how to find the missing angle in the triangle (using tan theta) but I don't know how to find the actual resultant angle (bearing).
The bearing is the angle between the resultant vector and a vector pointing due north, with the resultant vector angle measured clockwise from due north. Due north is 0 degrees bearing. Due east is 90 degrees bearing. Due south is 180 degrees bearing. Due west is 270 degrees bearing.
 
  • #66
Chestermiller said:
The bearing is the angle between the resultant vector and a vector pointing due north, with the resultant vector angle measured clockwise from due north.
I know that but I don't know how to figure out the resultant angle. I mean, in order to find the resultant angle you will need to first determine what quadrant the resultant vector is located in. Once you have determined the quadrant it is in, then you can go about figuring out the resultant angle. I don't know how to determine which quadrant it is located in. Like, for the previous question the resultant vector was located in quadrant 1 and for this question the resultant vector is located in quadrant 2. How do I determine this?
 
  • #67
physics4ever25 said:
I know that but I don't know how to figure out the resultant angle. I mean, in order to find the resultant angle you will need to first determine what quadrant the resultant vector is located in. Once you have determined the quadrant it is in, then you can go about figuring out the resultant angle. I don't know how to determine which quadrant it is located in.
In quadrant 1, the x and y components are both positive. The bearing is 0 to 90 degrees.
In quadrant 2, the x component is negative and the y component is positive. The bearing is 270 to 360 degrees.
In quadrant 3, the x component is negative and the y component is negative. The bearing is 180 to 270 degrees.
In quadrant 4, the x component is positive and the y component is negative. The bearing is 90 to 180 degrees.

The quadrants are numbered in counter-clockwise order. The bearings are numbered in clockwise order.
 
  • #68
Chestermiller said:
In quadrant 1, the x and y components are both positive. The bearing is 0 to 90 degrees.
In quadrant 2, the x component is negative and the y component is positive. The bearing is 270 to 360 degrees.
In quadrant 3, the x component is negative and the y component is negative. The bearing is 180 to 270 degrees.
In quadrant 4, the x component is positive and the y component is negative. The bearing is 90 to 180 degrees.

The quadrants are numbered in counter-clockwise order. The bearings are numbered in clockwise order.

Ah, that makes more sense, but just confused about something- wouldn't both the previous question and this question fall in quadrant 1 then? I mean, the total x and total y components for both the previous question and this question were positive.
 
  • #69
physics4ever25 said:
Ah, that makes more sense, but just confused about something- wouldn't both the previous question and this question fall in quadrant 1 then? I mean, the total x and total y components for both the previous question and this question were positive.
In the previous question, the x component was negative and the y component was positive. So that was 2nd quadrant.
 
  • #70
In the previous question the x component was +191.49 so it was a positive x-value?

EDIT: Also I just realized that the correct answer for the previous question in my book is 22.7 degrees for the bearing. We got 337.3 degrees, but the correct answer was actually 360-337.3=22.7
 
  • #71
physics4ever25 said:
In the previous question the x component was +191.49 so it was a positive x-value?

EDIT: Also I just realized that the correct answer for the previous question in my book is 22.7 degrees for the bearing. We got 337.3 degrees, but the correct answer was actually 360-337.3=22.7
You're right. Your figure in post #38 through me off. I thought that the dashed line was the resultant. You're absolutely right. The bearing should have been 22.7 degrees (90 - 67.3).
 
  • #72
Chestermiller said:
You're right. Your figure in post #38 through me off. I thought that the dashed line was the resultant. You're absolutely right. The bearing should have been 22.7 degrees (90 - 67.3).

The dashed line is the resultant vector though, isn't it? I mean, we found the magnitude of that side using the Pythagorean theorem, so that side must be the resultant.
 
  • #73
If it's headwind the answer is 505.51km/h @075.62 deg. If it's tailwind the answer is 597.209km/h @83.70 deg. The question says wind from bearing 120 deg so it's headwind. So answer is the first one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
2K