MHB Solve Trigonometry Angles: Degrees, Minutes & Seconds

Drain Brain
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
please help me to solve these problems,

1. how many degrees, minutes, and seconds are respectively passed over in $11\frac{1}{9}$ minutes by the hour and minute hands of a watch?

2. The number of degrees in one acute angle of a right-angled triangle is equal to the number of grades in the other; express both angles in degrees.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Drain Brain said:
2. The number of degrees in one acute angle of a right-angled triangle is equal to the number of grades in the other; express both angles in degrees.

View attachment 2986

The sum of the angles of a triangle is equal to $180^{\circ}$.

Therefore:

$$\hat{A}+\hat{B}+\hat{C}=180^{\circ} \Rightarrow 90^{\circ}+\hat{B}+\hat{C}=180^{\circ} \Rightarrow \hat{B}+\hat{C}=90^{\circ}$$

"The number of degrees in one acute angle of a right-angled triangle is equal to the number of grades in the other":
The two acute angles of the above right-angles trianle are $\hat{B}$ and $\hat{C}$.

So, $\hat{B}=\hat{C}$.

Replacing this at the equation $\hat{B}+\hat{C}=90^{\circ}$, we get the following:

$$\hat{B}+\hat{C}=90^{\circ} \Rightarrow 2 \hat{B}=90^{\circ} \Rightarrow \hat{B}=\hat{C}=45^{\circ}$$
 

Attachments

  • rt.png
    rt.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 107
Drain Brain said:
please help me to solve these problems,

1. how many degrees, minutes, and seconds are respectively passed over in $11\frac{1}{9}$ minutes by the hour and minute hands of a watch?

2. The number of degrees in one acute angle of a right-angled triangle is equal to the number of grades in the other; express both angles in degrees.

Can you show us what you have tried? This way our helpers know where you are stuck and can better help.

mathmari said:
View attachment 2986

The sum of the angles of a triangle is equal to $180^{\circ}$.

Therefore:

$$\hat{A}+\hat{B}+\hat{C}=180^{\circ} \Rightarrow 90^{\circ}+\hat{B}+\hat{C}=180^{\circ} \Rightarrow \hat{B}+\hat{C}=90^{\circ}$$

"The number of degrees in one acute angle of a right-angled triangle is equal to the number of grades in the other":
The two acute angles of the above right-angles trianle are $\hat{B}$ and $\hat{C}$.

So, $\hat{B}=\hat{C}$.

Replacing this at the equation $\hat{B}+\hat{C}=90^{\circ}$, we get the following:

$$\hat{B}+\hat{C}=90^{\circ} \Rightarrow 2 \hat{B}=90^{\circ} \Rightarrow \hat{B}=\hat{C}=45^{\circ}$$

I believe the OP was saying that one angle is measured in gradians while the other it in degrees. 400 gradians is equivalent to 360 degrees.
 
MarkFL said:
I believe the OP was saying that one angle is measured in gradians while the other it in degrees. 400 gradians is equivalent to 360 degrees.

Oh, I'm sorry.. (Lipssealed)(Wasntme)

The angle $A$ is $90^{\circ}$.
Let the acute angle $B$ be measured in gradians, so the angle $B$ is $x$ gradians which is equal to $\frac{360 x}{400}=0.9 x$ degrees.
The angle $C$ is $y$ degrees.

"The number of degrees in one acute angle of a right-angled triangle is equal to the number of grades in the other": $x=y$

The sum of the angles of the triangle is equal to $180$ degrees.

$$90^{\circ}+0.9 x+y=180^{\circ} \Rightarrow 0.9 x+x=90^{\circ} \Rightarrow 1.9x=90^{\circ} \Rightarrow x=\left (\frac{90}{1.9}\right )^{\circ}$$

Therefore, the angle $B$ is $ \left (0.9\cdot \frac{90}{1.9}\right )^{\circ}$ and the angle $C$ is $\left (\frac{90}{1.9}\right )^{\circ}$.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Back
Top