Solve Trigonometry Puzzle with P, S and H

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arildno
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Puzzle Trigonometry
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 13K views
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
10,165
Reaction score
138
Trigonometry "puzzle"

If we know the perimeter P of a triangle, a side S of it, and the height H down on the line going through S, then we have uniquely determined the triangle.

It is not wholly trivial to derive the expressions for the other two sides in terms of P,S and H.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm forgetting my algebra, but:

1) Essentially, we are given an ellipse, with the focii separated by S, a major axis of P, and if expressed as y=f(x), the corresponding y value of H for which we must solve.

2) The ellipse as a function (not purely as a function of x) might be:
sqrt((x+S/2)^2 + y^2) + sqrt((x-S/2)^2 + y^2) = P - S

3) Solve for x, given that y=H:
sqrt((x+S/2)^2 + H^2) + sqrt((x-S/2)^2 + H^2) = P - S
(I forget exactly how to go about this...)

4) With x in hand, it becomes trivial. The other sides would be:
Side 1 = sqrt((x+S/2)^2+y^2)
Side 2 = sqrt((x-S/2)^2+y^2)

DaveE
 
Last edited:
The neat touch is, of course, to go over to a coordinate representation of the end points and utilize the properties of an ellipse.

The "brute force" approach to directly relate the SIDE LENGTHS to each other, say with a couple of Pythagorases will lead to ugly non-linear equations.

EDIT
NOTE:
Your initial formula is wrong. On your right-hand side, it should say P-S, not P!
(The sum of the two other sides is constant)
 
Last edited:
arildno said:
The neat touch is, of course, to go over to a coordinate representation of the end points and utilize the properties of an ellipse.

Heh, that's all well and good if you remember your ellipse properties, but for those of us who're 14 years out of their geometry classes, we're stuck with brute force :) (short of going and looking up all those old properties)

arildno said:
The "brute force" approach to directly relate the SIDE LENGTHS to each other, say with a couple of Pythagorases will lead to ugly non-linear equations.

Out of curiosity, how *would* you go about solving that ugly equation for x? Anyone?

arildno said:
Your initial formula is wrong. On your right-hand side, it should say P-S, not P!

Ooops, fixed!

DaveE
 
Hmm..you gave the simple ellipse approach in your initial post.
Now, as for solving for x, the simplest way is like this:
[tex]\sqrt{(x-\frac{S}{2})^{2}+H^{2}}=(P-S)-\sqrt{(x+\frac{S}{2})^{2}+H^{2}}[/tex]
Square this expression, gaining:
[tex](x-\frac{S}{2})^{2}+H^{2}=(x+\frac{S}{2})^{2}+(P-S)^{2}-2(P-S)\sqrt{(x+\frac{S}{2})^{2}+H^{2}}[/tex]
Simplify to:
[tex]\sqrt{(x+\frac{S}{2})^{2}+H^{2}}=\frac{xS}{(P-S)}+\frac{(P-S)}{2}[/tex]
Re-square:
[tex](x+\frac{S}{2})^{2}+H^{2}=\frac{S^{2}}{(P-S)^{2}}x^{2}+xs+\frac{(P-S)^{2}}{4}[/tex]
Simplify this to:
[tex](1-\frac{S^{2}}{(P-S)^{2}})x^{2}=\frac{P(P-2S)}{4}-H^{2}[/tex]
From which we gain the positive solution:
[tex]x=\frac{(P-S)}{2}\sqrt{1-\epsilon},\epsilon=\frac{4H^{2}}{P(P-2S)}[/tex]
 
Cool question man.