Solve Trigonometry Puzzle with P, S and H

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arildno
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Puzzle Trigonometry
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a trigonometry puzzle involving a triangle defined by its perimeter P, one side S, and the height H from that side. Participants explore methods to derive the lengths of the remaining sides based on these parameters, examining both algebraic and geometric approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that knowing P, S, and H uniquely determines the triangle, though deriving the other sides is not straightforward.
  • Another participant suggests a connection to an ellipse, proposing a mathematical formulation involving the foci and major axis, but admits to forgetting some algebraic details.
  • A later reply points out an error in the initial formula, correcting it to reflect that the sum of the other two sides should equal P-S.
  • Some participants discuss the challenges of using brute force methods to relate side lengths, noting that this can lead to complex non-linear equations.
  • Further contributions provide algebraic manipulations aimed at solving for x, with one participant detailing a step-by-step approach to simplify the equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to solve the problem, with some favoring geometric interpretations while others prefer algebraic methods. There is no consensus on a single solution or method, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their algebraic skills and the complexity of the equations involved, which may affect their ability to derive a clear solution.

arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
10,165
Reaction score
138
Trigonometry "puzzle"

If we know the perimeter P of a triangle, a side S of it, and the height H down on the line going through S, then we have uniquely determined the triangle.

It is not wholly trivial to derive the expressions for the other two sides in terms of P,S and H.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm forgetting my algebra, but:

1) Essentially, we are given an ellipse, with the focii separated by S, a major axis of P, and if expressed as y=f(x), the corresponding y value of H for which we must solve.

2) The ellipse as a function (not purely as a function of x) might be:
sqrt((x+S/2)^2 + y^2) + sqrt((x-S/2)^2 + y^2) = P - S

3) Solve for x, given that y=H:
sqrt((x+S/2)^2 + H^2) + sqrt((x-S/2)^2 + H^2) = P - S
(I forget exactly how to go about this...)

4) With x in hand, it becomes trivial. The other sides would be:
Side 1 = sqrt((x+S/2)^2+y^2)
Side 2 = sqrt((x-S/2)^2+y^2)

DaveE
 
Last edited:
The neat touch is, of course, to go over to a coordinate representation of the end points and utilize the properties of an ellipse.

The "brute force" approach to directly relate the SIDE LENGTHS to each other, say with a couple of Pythagorases will lead to ugly non-linear equations.

EDIT
NOTE:
Your initial formula is wrong. On your right-hand side, it should say P-S, not P!
(The sum of the two other sides is constant)
 
Last edited:
arildno said:
The neat touch is, of course, to go over to a coordinate representation of the end points and utilize the properties of an ellipse.

Heh, that's all well and good if you remember your ellipse properties, but for those of us who're 14 years out of their geometry classes, we're stuck with brute force :) (short of going and looking up all those old properties)

arildno said:
The "brute force" approach to directly relate the SIDE LENGTHS to each other, say with a couple of Pythagorases will lead to ugly non-linear equations.

Out of curiosity, how *would* you go about solving that ugly equation for x? Anyone?

arildno said:
Your initial formula is wrong. On your right-hand side, it should say P-S, not P!

Ooops, fixed!

DaveE
 
Hmm..you gave the simple ellipse approach in your initial post.
Now, as for solving for x, the simplest way is like this:
[tex]\sqrt{(x-\frac{S}{2})^{2}+H^{2}}=(P-S)-\sqrt{(x+\frac{S}{2})^{2}+H^{2}}[/tex]
Square this expression, gaining:
[tex](x-\frac{S}{2})^{2}+H^{2}=(x+\frac{S}{2})^{2}+(P-S)^{2}-2(P-S)\sqrt{(x+\frac{S}{2})^{2}+H^{2}}[/tex]
Simplify to:
[tex]\sqrt{(x+\frac{S}{2})^{2}+H^{2}}=\frac{xS}{(P-S)}+\frac{(P-S)}{2}[/tex]
Re-square:
[tex](x+\frac{S}{2})^{2}+H^{2}=\frac{S^{2}}{(P-S)^{2}}x^{2}+xs+\frac{(P-S)^{2}}{4}[/tex]
Simplify this to:
[tex](1-\frac{S^{2}}{(P-S)^{2}})x^{2}=\frac{P(P-2S)}{4}-H^{2}[/tex]
From which we gain the positive solution:
[tex]x=\frac{(P-S)}{2}\sqrt{1-\epsilon},\epsilon=\frac{4H^{2}}{P(P-2S)}[/tex]
 
Cool question man.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K