MHB Solving 16•4^{-x}=4^x-6 Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Petrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
Petrus
Messages
702
Reaction score
0
Hello MHB,
I am stuck on this equation and don't know what to do, If i take ln it does not work, any advice?
$$16•4^{-x}=4^x-6$$

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try multiplying both sides by $4^x$. You get:
$$16 = (4^x)^2 - 6 \cdot 4^x$$
Now substitute $u = 4^x$. What do you see? :)
 
Petrus said:
Hello MHB,
I am stuck on this equation and don't know what to do, If i take ln it does not work, any advice?
$$16•4^{-x}=4^x-6$$

Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$

Set $4^{x}=y$, then solve for y and finally find $x = \frac{\ln y}{\ln 4}$ ...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Hello,
Thanks for the fast respond and help from you both!:) i succed to solve it with correct answer!:)
Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
974
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top