Solving 1D Collision Lab: Is it Elastic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter apaxapax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a one-dimensional collision lab involving two gliders with rubber band bumpers. The conclusion drawn is that the collision is inelastic, as evidenced by the data collected, which indicates a loss of momentum. The participants clarify that rubber bands, while marketed as elastic, do not behave perfectly elastically in collisions, leading to energy loss primarily through deformation and sound. An additional experiment is suggested to further explore the properties of rubber bands and their behavior under stress.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Familiarity with momentum conservation principles
  • Basic knowledge of experimental data collection and analysis
  • Experience with graphing and interpreting physical relationships
NEXT STEPS
  • Conduct experiments comparing different bumper materials in collision scenarios
  • Learn about energy transfer in inelastic collisions
  • Explore the physics of rubber band elasticity and deformation
  • Investigate the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in collision dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators conducting hands-on experiments, and anyone interested in the principles of momentum and energy transfer in collisions.

apaxapax
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello,

I have a question about a one dimensional collision lab done in class. We set up an air rail with two gliders..one at each end. Each glider had a rubber band bumper. We pushed them towards each other and they hit each other and bounced back some. We collected our data..see attachement.


Homework Equations



see attached

The Attempt at a Solution



The question that goes along with this collision is - is this an elastic collision?

Looking at the data I would say no. I am confused however because perfectly elastic, inelastic and elastic collisons should not show a loss of momentum. So I think we must have done something really wrong when we collected our data. Any thoughts?

thanks much
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    21 KB · Views: 488
Physics news on Phys.org
Rubber bands huh?

Your data shows it was an inelastic collision all-right. Rubber bands are good for this. The word "elastic" used by the manufacturer is just marketing - elastic bands are not all that elastic, they are just stretchy.

Where do you think the energy and momentum went?
Did the bumpers go "twang"? Did they heat up?

Here's another experiment for you:

Get a bunch of rubber-bands and join them together so you get one long one.
Suspend it, add weights in even increments (I've done this with 4 bands and 20g washers) and graph the stretched length against weight added.
(predict, before you do, what the shape of the graph will be.)

When you run out of ruler, reverse the process - take weights away, and plot the length against weight as before. (usually you want 20-40 reading total.)
(predict: before you do, what path do you expect the graph to follow?)

Comment on the curves you get.

If you've not done it - do it. You can do this at home.
I count this experiment as essential for learning physics.
 
Thanks for the response.

So what your saying is the rubber bands absorbed the momentum? So the momentum was preserved in the rubber bands? Since they did go twang (stretch)? I am guessing not much heat was generated during the twang. So energy was lost during the stretch(deformation)?
 
Momentum and got transferred to motion in the molecules of the rubber band (heat), as well as motion of air molecules (sound). If you do the experiment I suggested you'll see why.
 
Thanks for the help Simon
 
No worries.

For best effect, repeat the collision experiment with different bumpers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K