Solving 2nd order differential equation with non-constant coefficients

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving second-order differential equations with non-constant coefficients, specifically focusing on two equations: one involving a boundary value problem and another with trigonometric functions. Participants explore various methods and approaches to find solutions, including series solutions and substitutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the equation x²y'' + xy' + (k²x² - 1)y = 0 and notes difficulty in satisfying boundary conditions y(0) = 0 and y(1) = 0, suggesting the need for a non-trivial solution.
  • Another participant suggests using Frobenius' method for solving the differential equation due to its regular singular nature at x = 0.
  • A different approach is proposed, recommending a change of variables to relate the equation to a Bessel differential equation, with a focus on selecting k to ensure a zero at x = 1.
  • Further exploration of variable substitutions, such as u = ln(x), is discussed as a potential method for finding solutions.
  • Another participant introduces a different equation involving trigonometric functions, asking whether to expand sin and cos in series or to use Laplace transforms.
  • Participants suggest substitution methods for the trigonometric equation, with one participant expressing gratitude for the assistance received.
  • In a separate query, a participant seeks help with the equation y'' = y sin(x), expressing uncertainty about the next steps after multiplying both sides by 2y'.
  • Another participant provides a suggestion involving the integration of terms and mentions the complexity introduced by sin(x), indicating that a closed form may involve Mathieu's special functions.
  • One participant acknowledges their mistake in the integration process and expresses frustration with the differential equation.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of not diverting from the original thread topic and suggests starting a new thread for unrelated questions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views and methods for solving the differential equations, with no consensus reached on a single approach or solution. The discussion remains unresolved with various hypotheses and suggestions offered.

Contextual Notes

Some methods proposed, such as Frobenius' method and variable substitutions, depend on specific conditions and assumptions that may not be universally applicable. The complexity of the equations and the presence of trigonometric functions introduce additional challenges that are not fully resolved in the discussion.

paul143
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi~

I'm having trouble with solving a certain differential equation.

x2y'' + x y'+(k2x2-1)y = 0

I'm tasked to find a solution that satisfies the boundary conditions: y(0)=0 and y(1)=0

I have tried solving this using the characteristic equation, but i arrived at a solution that is unable to satisfy the boundary conditions except for when y(x)=0 (which is trivial).

Any pointers on how i should go about this?

Actually, i am trying to find the Green's function for this differential equation, which is why I need the solution to the said equation first. Thanks so much for any help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is at least one obvious solution: y= 0 for all x. Since that is a regular singular equation at 0, you probably will want to use "Frobenius' method", using power series. That is much too complicated to explain here- try
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frobenius_method
 
Last edited by a moderator:
See the "Bessel" differential equation. Change variables to convert yours to that. So what you need to do is select k so that your solution has a zero at 1.
 
Thanks for the tip!

Are there any possible way to solve this? Like possibly an out of this world change in variables (ex let u = lnx)? or series substitution?
 
Hi every body,

I have another kind of equation which seems rather difficult to solve

(1 + a Sin(x)) y'' + a Cos(x) y' + b Sin(x) y = 0

Should I first expand sin and cos in their series and then try Laplace or serious solution methods? Or there is a method that can solve it directly?
Please help?
 
river_boy said:
Hi every body,

I have another kind of equation which seems rather difficult to solve

(1 + a Sin(x)) y'' + a Cos(x) y' + b Sin(x) y = 0

Should I first expand sin and cos in their series and then try Laplace or serious solution methods? Or there is a method that can solve it directly?
Please help?

Try substitution

u=(1+aSin(x))
 
stallionx said:
Try substitution

u=(1+aSin(x))

Thanks its really helping.
 
Please help me to solve this DE: y''=ysinx
(I think i should multiply both sides with 2y' but I don't know how to do next)

thanks in advance ^^
 
Ceria_land said:
Please yhelp me to solve this DE: y''=ysinx
(I think i should multiply both sides with 2y' but I don't know how to do next)
thanks in advance ^^
(y')² = y²sin(x)+C
You can find the solutions in the particular case C=0 in terms of exponential of Incomplete elliptic integral of the second kind.
 
  • #10
JJacquelin said:
(y')² = y²sin(x)+C
You can find the solutions in the particular case C=0 in terms of exponential of Incomplete elliptic integral of the second kind.

I'm afraid that sin(x) ruins the integration, and as such you're missing a term ##-\int dx y(x) \cos(x)##. After multiplying by 2y' you get

$$\frac{d}{dx}(y')^2 = \left[\frac{d}{dx}(y^2)\right] \sin(x),$$
which can't be integrated exactly - you get ##(y')^2 = y^2\sin(x) + C - \int dx~y(x) \cos(x)##.
 
  • #11
Mute said:
I'm afraid that sin(x) ruins the integration, and as such you're missing a term ##-\int dx y(x) \cos(x)##. .
You are right. My mistake !
Damn ODE !
 
  • #12

Attachments

  • Mathieu.JPG
    Mathieu.JPG
    17 KB · Views: 568
Last edited:
  • #13
  • #14
paul143 said:
Thanks for the tip!

Are there any possible way to solve this? Like possibly an out of this world change in variables (ex let u = lnx)? or series substitution?
You have already been given two methods, Frobenius and a change of variables that changes this to a Bessel equation, and a complete solution: y(x)= 0. What more do you want?
 
  • #15
Ceria_land said:
Thanks to JJacquelin and Mute for helping! it's really helpful :)
In future, however, please do not "hi-jack" someone else's thread to ask a new question. Use the "new thread" button to start your own thread.
 
  • #16
HallsofIvy said:
In future, however, please do not "hi-jack" someone else's thread to ask a new question. Use the "new thread" button to start your own thread.

Thanks for your warning. I won't do it again :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K