Solving a 2.2kg Block Incline Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter GOPgabe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Incline
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a 2.2kg block sliding down a 30-degree incline and subsequently sliding up an identical incline. The potential energy at the start is calculated as 215.82 J using the formula P.E. = mgh. The frictional force, calculated using Ff = u mg cos(theta), affects the block's ascent, resulting in a maximum height of approximately 6.53m instead of the expected 7m. Participants suggest breaking the problem into two parts to accurately account for kinetic energy and frictional losses during the ascent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as potential energy and kinetic energy
  • Familiarity with frictional forces and their calculations
  • Knowledge of trigonometry, specifically in relation to inclined planes
  • Ability to apply conservation of energy principles in problem-solving
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Learn how to calculate work done by friction on inclined planes
  • Explore the effects of different coefficients of friction on motion
  • Practice solving similar problems involving inclined planes and energy transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of motion on inclined planes.

GOPgabe
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2.2kg block slides down a planar incline. The incline makes an angle of thirty degrees with the horizontal and the block starts 10 m above ground. The coefficient of friction between the block and the incline is .1. The block reaches the bottom of the incline and then slides up an identical incline on the other side. To what vertical height will the block slide on the second incline? Ans. 7m

Homework Equations


P.E.= mgh
Ff=u mg cos (theta)


The Attempt at a Solution



The potential energy is =2.2*9.81*10=215.82

Here's where I'm a little unsure.
The work done by Ff is u mg cos(theta) * 20 ( the hypotenuse) *2, because you have to account for it up, right?

So 215-74.686=141.34

To account for height I think mgh works so 141.34/(2.2*9.81).

I get 6.53, not 7. Did I do this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GOPgabe said:
The potential energy is =2.2*9.81*10=215.82
So far so good. :approve:
Here's where I'm a little unsure.
The work done by Ff is u mg cos(theta) * 20 ( the hypotenuse) *2, because you have to account for it up, right?
Well, you do have to account for it going back up, yes. But the way you have done it, you are accounting for it going all the way back up, to reach a total height of 10 m (i.e. another distance of 20 m back up along the hypotenuse).

But you can be sure, that due to friction (and conservation of energy), that it's not going to make it that far back up. You can bet that the frictional losses will be greater when going down than back up, because the object doesn't travel as far on the way back up. (For a constant force like friction on a dry flat surface, [itex]W = \mathbf{F_f} \cdot \mathbf{s} [/tex]. But we don't know what <i><b>s</b></i> is yet, on the way back up.) <br /> <br /> I suggest breaking the problem up into two parts. Find the kinetic energy when it reaches the bottom. Using that interim value, then set up a new equation in terms of an unknown distance back up the incline. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":wink:" title="Wink :wink:" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=":wink:" />[/itex]
 
Got it! Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K