Block on an inclined plane that is accelerating sideways

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block of mass m resting on an inclined plane with angle θ that is accelerating to the right with acceleration a. The coefficient of static friction is μ. The question seeks to determine the range of acceleration a for which the block remains at rest on the plane.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss drawing free body diagrams and setting up equations based on forces acting on the block. There is an exploration of the relationship between the normal force, gravitational force, and frictional force. Some participants question the validity of the original question, suggesting that the block cannot be both at rest and accelerating.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the problem with participants providing different interpretations of the conditions under which the block remains at rest. Some have suggested specific values for acceleration based on their calculations, while others have raised questions about the assumptions made in the setup. The discussion is productive, with participants offering guidance and corrections to each other's reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering special angles and the implications of different values of the coefficient of friction, including scenarios where μ may exceed 1. There is uncertainty regarding the conditions under which the block will slip or remain stationary, particularly in relation to extreme angles.

FScheuer

Homework Statement


[/B]
A block of mass m rests on an inclined plane with angle o accelerating to the right with acceleration a. The coefficient of static friction is u.

Homework Equations



For what range of a does the block remain at rest on the plane.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I started by drawing a free body diagram with a gravitational force, normal force, and frictional force. The horizontal component of my frictional force is in the direction of the acceleration. I believe solving for this should give me the lowest value of a where the block remains at rest. I set all of the horizontal comments equal to ma (Fncos(o) + uFncos(o) = ma), and all of the vertical components to 0 (Fnsin(o) - mg - uFnsin(o) = 0). I then set each of those equations equal to Fn, the normal force, and then set them equal to each other (ma/(cos(o)(1 + u)) = mg/(sin(o)(1 - u)). For the lowest value of a, I got a = gcot(o).
Is what I’ve done so far correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not correct. First, make sure the question is correct. The block is either at rest or accelerating. Can't be both.
FScheuer said:
For what range of a does the block remain at rest on the plane.
If this is the real question, the answer is not a range, but a very specific value. Hint: it is not non-zero.
 
lewando said:
Not correct. First, make sure the question is correct. The block is either at rest or accelerating. Can't be both.

If this is the real question, the answer is not a range, but a very specific value. Hint: it is not non-zero.
The block is at rest with respect to the plane for a range of values of a.

Here is a picture of the question.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0743.jpg
    IMG_0743.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 500
FScheuer said:
Here is a picture of the question.
Can you Upload a picture of the problem (see the button in the lower right)? And Upload your work so far, including your FBD. Thanks.
 
berkeman said:
Can you Upload a picture of the problem (see the button in the lower right)? And Upload your work so far, including your FBD. Thanks.

I looked over my work and got a slightly different answer. I now have gcot(o)((1 + u)/(1 - u))

Anyway, here is my work so far and the question. I would think that the work that I did would give me the lowest value of a in the range. Then to get the highest value I would do the same thing expect with the frictional force acting in the opposite direction.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0753.jpg
    IMG_0753.jpg
    39 KB · Views: 520
  • IMG_0743.jpg
    IMG_0743.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 498
FScheuer said:
I looked over my work and got a slightly different answer. I now have gcot(o)((1 + u)/(1 - u))

Anyway, here is my work so far and the question. I would think that the work that I did would give me the lowest value of a in the range. Then to get the highest value I would do the same thing expect with the frictional force acting in the opposite direction.
Check your uses of sine and cosine. I find it helps to consider extreme cases. E.g. if θ=0, what would the horizontal component of the normal force be? With experience, you might also recognise that equations involving friction generally have terms FN and FNμ with different trig functions, not the same one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
haruspex said:
Check your uses of sine and cosine. I find it helps to consider extreme cases. E.g. if θ=0, what would the horizontal component of the normal force be? With experience, you might also recognise that equations involving friction generally have terms FN and FNμ with different trig functions, not the same one.
I switched the cos and sin on the normal force. I had those mixed up. Now my answer for the lowest value of a is

a = g((sin(o) + ucos(o))/(cos(o) - usin(o)))
 
FScheuer said:
I switched the cos and sin on the normal force. I had those mixed up. Now my answer for the lowest value of a is

a = g((sin(o) + ucos(o))/(cos(o) - usin(o)))
That is certainly one critical value, but how do you conclude it is the lowest of the range?

By the way, writing tan(α) for μ yields interesting forms of the equations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
haruspex said:
That is certainly one critical value, but how do you conclude it is the lowest of the range?

By the way, writing tan(α) for μ yields interesting forms of the equations.
My bad, I now think it should be the highest possible value because I chose the frictional force to be acting down the incline. If I do the same thing with the frictional force acting up the incline, I think I will get the lowest possible value.
 
  • #10
FScheuer said:
My bad, I now think it should be the highest possible value because I chose the frictional force to be acting down the incline. If I do the same thing with the frictional force acting up the incline, I think I will get the lowest possible value.
Agreed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
  • #11
I now have a = g((sin(o) - ucos(o))/(cos(o) + usin(o))) for the low value, and a = g((sin(o) + ucos(o))/(cos(o) - usin(o))) for the high value. I’m not quite sure what they want when they ask for the special angles. Is it just the angle where the lowest value is equal to 0 and the angle where there is a vertical asymptote?
 
  • #12
FScheuer said:
when they ask for the special angles. Is it just the angle where the lowest value is equal to 0 and the angle where there is a vertical asymptote?
I would say so.
Did you try writing tan(α) for μ as I suggested?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
  • #13
haruspex said:
I would say so.
Did you try writing tan(α) for μ as I suggested?
After plugging that in for the lower value I got a = 0.

So would one of the angles be arctan(μ), being the smallest angle that the block can remain stationary on the rightward accelerating plane?

And then the other arccot(μ), being the angle at which the block can no longer remain on the plane?
 
  • #14
FScheuer said:
arctan(μ), being the smallest angle that the block can remain stationary on the rightward accelerating plane?
No. The equation in this case is for the least acceleration consistent with staying put, and that value of the angle says that that least acceleration is zero.
FScheuer said:
arccot(μ), being the angle at which the block can no longer remain on the plane?
No. The equation in this case is for the largest acceleration at which it will stay put. The value arccot(μ) gives an infinite acceleration. So with that angle, at what acceleration would the mass slip?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
  • #15
haruspex said:
No. The equation in this case is for the largest acceleration at which it will stay put. The value arccot(μ) gives an infinite acceleration. So with that angle, at what acceleration would the mass slip?
The block shouldn’t slip regardless of the acceleration at that point.

So arctan(μ) and arccot(μ) should be the special angles, the former being the angle where the lowest value of a is 0, and the latter being where there is no value of a too large for the block to remain stationary relative to the plane.
 
  • #16
FScheuer said:
The block shouldn’t slip regardless of the acceleration at that point.

So arctan(μ) and arccot(μ) should be the special angles, the former being the angle where the lowest value of a is 0, and the latter being where there is no value of a too large for the block to remain stationary relative to the plane.
Right.
But something is bothering me... what if μ>1?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
  • #17
haruspex said:
Right.
But something is bothering me... what if μ>1?
I can’t think of any reasons that there would be problems or anything special when μ > 1. What exactly do you mean by that?
 
  • #18
FScheuer said:
I can’t think of any reasons that there would be problems or anything special when μ > 1. What exactly do you mean by that?
It was not specifically μ>1, but considering large μ made me realize we have something not quite right in the first part of the question.
Writing tan(α) for μ your min and max expressions become ##\tan(\theta-\alpha)\leq\frac ag\leq\tan(\theta+\alpha)##.
What if ##\theta+\alpha>\frac \pi 2##?##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
  • #19
haruspex said:
It was not specifically μ>1, but considering large μ made me realize we have something not quite right in the first part of the question.
Writing tan(α) for μ your min and max expressions become ##\tan(\theta-\alpha)\leq\frac ag\leq\tan(\theta+\alpha)##.
What if ##\theta+\alpha>\frac \pi 2##?##
I’m not quite sure where the a is coming from. The interesting values seem to come when I plug in tan(theta) and cot(theta) in for μ rather than tan(a).

I think I might see what you’re talking about though. The highest value of a where the block can remain at rest approaches infinity, but then if the angle is large enough, that value of a becomes negative and lies to the right of the asymptote. I’m not quite sure why this is happening. Is my second equation wrong?
 
  • #20
FScheuer said:
I’m not quite sure where the a is coming from.
Not a, α (alpha). Just choosing to represent μ in terms of an angle, because of the way it simplifies the equations.
FScheuer said:
Is my second equation wrong?
It is incomplete, in the sense that the equation is only valid over a certain range.
Can you tell me what is wrong with this statement:
"If a body is not sliding on a surface with which it is in contact under a normal force N then the frictional force is μsN"
?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
  • #21
haruspex said:
Not a, α (alpha). Just choosing to represent μ in terms of an angle, because of the way it simplifies the equations.

It is incomplete, in the sense that the equation is only valid over a certain range.
Can you tell me what is wrong with this statement:
"If a body is not sliding on a surface with which it is in contact under a normal force N then the frictional force is μsN"
?
The frictional force is not necessarily equal to that value, but can resist a force that is less than or equal to it.
 
  • #22
FScheuer said:
The frictional force is not necessarily equal to that value, but can resist a force that is less than or equal to it.
Right. So how would you qualify the equation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
  • #23
haruspex said:
Right. So how would you qualify the equation?
For the equation that gives the highest value of a, would it just be theta < arccot(u)?
 
  • #24
FScheuer said:
For the equation that gives the highest value of a, would it just be theta < arccot(u)?
You need to break it into cases. If cot(θ)>μ then ... else ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
  • #25
haruspex said:
You need to break it into cases. If cot(θ)>μ then ... else ...
Would the equation for the high value of a work for all angles between 0 and arccot(u) and then all angles between arccot(u) and 90 have no maximum value of a for which the block doesn’t rest on the plane?
 
  • #26
FScheuer said:
Would the equation for the high value of a work for all angles between 0 and arccot(u) and then all angles between arccot(u) and 90 have no maximum value of a for which the block doesn’t rest on the plane?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer
  • #27
haruspex said:
Yes.
I understand conceptually why this is the case, but can you explain mathmatecally why the equation I found works for some value but not others, and how to figure out which values work?
 
  • #28
FScheuer said:
I understand conceptually why this is the case, but can you explain mathmatecally why the equation I found works for some value but not others, and how to figure out which values work?
Your derivation assumed the frictional force was μsN. That is valid as long as the acceleration can be made so large that such a high frictional force is needed. When that is no longer true the equation is incorrect.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FScheuer

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
680
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K