Solving a>b, b>-c, and a>-c: HSTC

  • Thread starter Thread starter drema9
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a logical problem involving implications and their relationships. Participants are tasked with deriving the expression -a v -c from a set of premises involving implications and disjunctions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the premises, questioning the relationships between the statements and how to derive the desired conclusion. There are discussions about the meaning of logical operators and the steps taken to reach certain deductions.

Discussion Status

Several participants are engaged in clarifying their understanding of the logical deductions. Some have made progress towards the solution, while others express confusion about specific steps and the implications of the operators used. Guidance has been offered regarding the use of implications and the relationship between different logical statements.

Contextual Notes

There is some uncertainty regarding the interpretation of the logical operators, particularly the conjunction and implication symbols. Participants are also navigating the rules of natural deduction and their application in this context.

drema9
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
the question is.
1. (a>b). (b>c)
2. c>-d
3. b>e
4. -d>f
5. -e v -f

We have to find -a v -c

i can get so far then bam nothing! any help would be great thank you.

6. a>b 1 simp
7. b>-c 1,6, mp
8. a>-c h.s.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm confused by the first line. Is it A[tex]\rightarrow[/tex]B and B[tex]\rightarrow[/tex]C ?

Anyways, you're close to a solution in 8. Do you know a relation between the implication and or operators? In other words, do you know a statement using implication that is logically equivalent to the statement -a v -c ?

The problem is I don't follow your deduction of line 7, how do you get b>-c from a>b and b>c?

If you can deduce -a v -c you're practically done.
 
Last edited:
thks

i deduced line seven (b>-c)
taking line one which is ( a>b) and (b>-c)
and line six (a>b).

I don't know how to get the -a v-c.
 
I see... In your original post you have b>c. Your deduction is correct.
 
cool

cool,
any idea what a next step would be? this one is driving me nuts
 
I think you only need to find -A and you can make an Add to get -A v -C.
 
drema9 said:
the question is.
1. (a>b). (b>c)

I don't understand the (.) operator, What does mean?
 
drema9 said:
the question is.
1. (a>b). (b>c)
2. c>-d
3. b>e
4. -d>f
5. -e v -f

We have to find -a v -c

i can get so far then bam nothing! any help would be great thank you.

6. a>b 1 simp
7. b>-c 1,6, mp
8. a>-c h.s.

Hey you only need one step. If you reach to step 8 then you only need to make an implication of 8.

Implication
P[tex]\rightarrow[/tex]Q:: -P v Q
 
ok, i am still stuck i can not get -a then i can wedge in the last part.
 
  • #10
drema9 said:
ok, i am still stuck i can not get -a then i can wedge in the last part.

Why?
If you have a>-c by implication you have -a v -c
 
  • #11
some remarks, if you intended already to deduce from (a->b)&(b->c) by mp b->c why didn't you use simplification on it?
anyway here's one proof:
1. (a->b). (b->c)
2. c->~d
3. b->e
4. ~d->f
5. ~e v ~f
6. a->b 1,simp
7. a->e 3,6 hypothetical syllogism.
8. f->~e 5,material conditional.
9. ~d->~e 4,8, hypo syllogsim
10. c->~e 2,9 h.s
11. ~~e->~c 10, modus tollens.
12. e->~c 11, double negation.
13. ~e->~a 7,modus tollens.
now you can take it yourself.

p.s in questions in logic in the future take care on describing which rules of natural deduction you can use and which you cannot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K