Solving a Differential Equation: Finding F(x,y)

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation and understanding the concept of exact equations. The original poster expresses confusion about the form required for exact equations and how to find a function F(x,y) whose level curves represent solutions to the given differential equation. Participants clarify that an equation can be exact without adhering to a specific form and explain how to check for exactness by comparing mixed second derivatives. They also suggest starting with simple solutions and integrating to find F(x,y), ultimately leading to a solution that confirms the initial misunderstanding about the equation's form. The conversation emphasizes the importance of exploring various approaches to tackle differential equations effectively.
mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone! Its me! I'm stuck, these are suppose to be exact equations, and yet its not in exact equation forum. I thought being an exact equation you have to have the following form:

http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/AllBrowsers/3401/Exact_files/eq0008M.gif

But my question is the following:
Find a function F(x,y) whose level curves are solutions to the differential equation
http://cwcsrv11.cwc.psu.edu/webwork2_files/tmp/equations/a6/62aa7a4c8735852fb4ffa4df53d26d1.png
http://cwcsrv11.cwc.psu.edu/webwork2_files/tmp/equations/8d/8616ca1dd6ce230911485b98a57fa31.png
I rearranged it so its now:
y - x dx/dy = 0
but its not dy/dx, its dx/dy! so what happens? T hanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It means that you would be looking for some function
x(y)

You could just as well express it as

x - y \frac {dy} {dx} = 0

if it makes you more comfortable.
 
..test some simple solutions first

For instance:

Let M(x,y) = x^n A(y) and N = x^m B(y), where y = (sum over all i's) of:

r0 + r1 x + r2 x^2 + r3 x^3 ...r(i)x^i for i less than I(sub)n.

See if M=constant works..N=constant works...etc..

Then try some transcendentals..exp(x), sin(x) etc..

Non-linear equations want to you to 'play with them'..before they tell
you what is going on.

WW

<---getting LaTex soon
 
Thanks, so what ur saying is i just gota start guessing? how do uknow what to even guess by?
 
simple solutions (part II)

...your general form:

y = +/- sqr(x^2) + C0 when multiplied by a second solution ys = W(x)s

where W = {(sum over all j) v0 + v1 x + v2x^3 ...v(j)x^j} times s(y),

may give more solutions for your N= (whatever) ; M(whatever) non-polynomial factors. Some simple polynomials however lead directly into very involved transcendentals..for instance the D.E.: (second DE)

y" = x^2 + x is a form of the elliptic logarithm.

You might try the Steven Wolfram site on an "unsolvable".

WW
 
mr_coffee said:
Hello everyone! Its me! I'm stuck, these are suppose to be exact equations, and yet its not in exact equation forum. I thought being an exact equation you have to have the following form:

http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/AllBrowsers/3401/Exact_files/eq0008M.gif

But my question is the following:
Find a function F(x,y) whose level curves are solutions to the differential equation
http://cwcsrv11.cwc.psu.edu/webwork2_files/tmp/equations/a6/62aa7a4c8735852fb4ffa4df53d26d1.png
http://cwcsrv11.cwc.psu.edu/webwork2_files/tmp/equations/8d/8616ca1dd6ce230911485b98a57fa31.png
I rearranged it so its now:
y - x dx/dy = 0
but its not dy/dx, its dx/dy! so what happens? T hanks.

Why would you rearrange it like that? You don't have to have any particular form in order for an equation to be exact. "exact" simply means that it can be put in the form M(x,y)dx+ N(x,y)dy = 0 and that there exist a function F(x,y) such that dF(x,y)= M(x,y)dx+ N(x,y)dy so that the equation is of the form dF(x,y)= 0 and has solution F(x,y)= C. One way to check for that is to check the equality of the mixed second derivatives of F: Fxy= My= Nx= Fyx.

ydy- xdx= 0 certainly is exact: (y)x= 0= (-x)y. You could then say: Fy= y so F(x,y)= (1/2)y2+ f(x). From that Fx= f'(x)= -x so f(x)= -(1/2)x2. The solution is F(x,y)= (1/2)(y2- x2)= C

Even more simply, the equation is obviously separable: ydy= xdx. Integrating both parts, (1/2)y2= (1/2)x2+ C which gives exactly the same answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
..ok..correction

should read:

dy^2/dx^2 = y + y^2 (elliptic logarithm)

..and,...hmm they use these as basis spaces for Complex Proofs..

Have you had numerical series solving? There are existence proofs
using summation analysis, product functionals and Fourier.

For instance the 2D Laplace form for F(x,y):

L(f,s) = int f(x,y) exp(-sy) dy int exp(-vx)dx | from 0 to ymax:xmax

...enough already*.

I am getting LaTex before I come back here.

WW

*(..cancelling my warp drive journal..till then as well..email me for info)
 
Thanks everyone, and thank you IVEY, i don't know why I thought it had to be in that form. That was a lot easier then I expected! and yes the answer was:
http://cwcsrv11.cwc.psu.edu/webwork2_files/tmp/equations/f5/7102c63fed37197e439d0270e34b001.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K