foo9008
- 676
- 4
Homework Statement
in the second picture (refer to the circled part) , i can understand the ΣKQ^n , but i don't understand the second one , why it will become ΔQΣKnQ^(n-1) ?
The discussion revolves around understanding a mathematical expression involving summations and differentials, specifically focusing on the terms ΣKQ^n and ΔQΣKnQ^(n-1). Participants are trying to clarify the transformation of the second term and its implications.
The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the mathematical expressions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between ΔQ and Q, but there is no explicit consensus on the understanding of the terms involved.
There appears to be some difficulty in reading the exponents, which may be affecting participants' understanding. The original poster references a specific picture for context, indicating that visual elements are part of the problem setup.
not reallyBvU said:Can't read the exponents. Did you understand 5.13 ?
removedBvU said:It all hinges on $$\Delta Q << Q \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ (Q + \Delta Q)^2 = Q^2 + 2 Q\, \Delta Q + (\Delta Q)^2\approx Q^2 + 2 Q \Delta Q$$ which is satisfied (maybe not in the first iteration, but later on it is) -- ##\Delta Q## gets smaller and smaller if you do things right.
(I filled in n = 2 for simplicity)
You could also see this as a differentiation ( ##{dh\over dQ} = 2KQ {\rm \ \ or \ \ } \Delta h = 2 Q \Delta Q ## ) and then the method is basically the Newton method