Solving a PDE with boundary problem

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a partial differential equation (PDE) with a boundary condition in the half-plane defined by x > 0. The proposed solution takes the form of an exponential function, but the poster is uncertain about proving this and why the solution should depend only on the variable x. There is confusion regarding the implications of translating the variable y and how it affects the problem, with some participants noting that the reasoning for z translation is similar. The conversation highlights the need for a deeper understanding of PDEs to clarify these concepts. Overall, the thread emphasizes the challenges faced in solving PDEs with boundary conditions and the importance of variable dependencies.
Karl86
Messages
40
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


I want to find the solution to the following problem:
$$\begin{cases} \nabla^2 B=c^2 B &\text{ on the half plane } x>0 \\ B=B_0 \hat{z} & \text{ for } x<0 \end{cases}$$
in the ##xz## plane. ##c, B_0 \in \mathbb{R}##

Homework Equations


I am not really sure what would be relevant. I could solve this if I knew that B is a function of only one variable
but it can a priori be a function of ##x,y,z##.

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the solution to be of the form ##C_1 e^{\frac{x}{d}} + C_2 e^{-\frac{x}{d}} ##. But I have no idea how to prove it. I have not really taken a proper course in PDEs. In particular it's not clear to me why the solution has to depend only on x, for example.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Karl86 said:
In particular it's not clear to me why the solution has to depend only on x, for example.
What happens to the problem if you make the translation ##y \to y + y_0##?
 
  • Like
Likes Karl86
Orodruin said:
What happens to the problem if you make the translation ##y \to y + y_0##?
Good point. The ##z## translation is a bit more problematic to me.
 
Karl86 said:
Good point. The zzz translation is a bit more problematic to me.
Why? The argument is 100 % the same.
 
  • Like
Likes Karl86
Orodruin said:
Why? The argument is 100 % the same.
Oops. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
5K