An electron in an oscillating magnetic field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an electron at rest in an oscillating magnetic field described by the equation $$ \mathbf B = B_0 cos\left( ωt \right) \hat k $$. The inquiry focuses on determining the minimum field strength (##B_0##) necessary to achieve a complete flip in the spin component along the x-axis (##S_x##).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the meaning of a "complete flip" in the context of spin states, suggesting it refers to transitioning between spin-up and spin-down states along the x-axis. There is also exploration of how this relates to the probability of measuring specific spin states.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants clarifying the interpretation of terms and the relationship between probability measurements and the concept of a complete flip. Some guidance has been provided regarding the implications of the probability equations presented.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted language barrier affecting the original poster's understanding of the problem statement, which may influence the clarity of the discussion.

Haorong Wu
Messages
419
Reaction score
90

Homework Statement


An electron is at rest in an oscillating magnetic field
$$ \mathbf B = B_0 cos\left( ωt \right) \hat k $$
where ##B_0## and ##ω## are constants.

What is the minimum field (##B_0##) required to force a complete flip in ##S_x##?

Homework Equations


$$H=- γ \mathbf B \cdot \mathbf S $$
$$ c^{(x)}_{-} = χ^{(x)†}_{-} χ$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I have solved that
$$ χ(t) = \begin{pmatrix} \frac 1 {\sqrt 2} exp \left( -i \frac {γ B_0} {2ω} sin ( ωt ) \right) \\ \frac 1 {\sqrt 2} exp \left( i \frac {γ B_0} {2ω} sin ( ωt ) \right) \end{pmatrix} $$
Also, the probability of getting ##- \frac \hbar 2## by measuring ##S_x## is
$$ P(- \frac \hbar 2 ) = {| c^{(x)}_{-} |}^2 = sin^2 ( \frac {γ B_0 sin(ωt)} {2ω}) $$

The statement of "to force a complete flip in ##S_x##" troubles me. Since English is not my first language, I failed to find out the meaning of the statement at google. From the solution, it seems that the probability ## P(- \frac \hbar 2 ) =1 ## relates to something that forces a complete flip.
So, what is a complete flip?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is definitely not clear, but I would consider a "complete flip" to mean going from spin-up to spin-down (or vice versa). In this case, it would be spin-up or down along the x axis.
 
DrClaude said:
This is definitely not clear, but I would consider a "complete flip" to mean going from spin-up to spin-down (or vice versa). In this case, it would be spin-up or down along the x axis.

But how does it relate to the probability ##P(- \frac \hbar 2)=1## ?

Thanks!
 
Haorong Wu said:
But how does it relate to the probability ##P(- \frac \hbar 2)=1## ?
Reading that as ##P(S_x = -\hbar/2)=1##, that corresponds to a spin-down state along x. So starting from spin-up, you have ##P(S_x = \hbar/2)=1##, and when ##P(S_x = -\hbar/2)=1## is attained, that means it is a "complete flip."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haorong Wu
DrClaude said:
Reading that as ##P(S_x = -\hbar/2)=1##, that corresponds to a spin-down state along x. So starting from spin-up, you have ##P(S_x = \hbar/2)=1##, and when ##P(S_x = -\hbar/2)=1## is attained, that means it is a "complete flip."

Thank you very much! It makes sense to me now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K