MHB Solving a Trigonometric Equation for Cos (x)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the trigonometric equation 2cos(x) + 5sec(x) = 1.1. A participant initially misapplies the equation, leading to confusion over the correct formulation and resulting in a negative discriminant. Clarifications reveal that the original equation was misquoted, affecting the calculations. The correct approach involves rewriting the equation in quadratic form, allowing for the application of the quadratic formula. The conversation emphasizes careful transcription of equations to avoid errors in solving trigonometric problems.
melissax
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi, may you help me?
I have a question I solved but couldn't ended.

If cos(x)+5Sec(x)=1.1 then Cos(x)=?

2Cos(x)+5Sec(x) =11/10

2Cos(x)+5/Cos(x)=11/10

2Cos(x)*Cos(x)+5=11/10*Cos(x)

2Cos^2(x)+5=11/10*Cos(x)

2Cos^2(x)-11/10-Cos(x)-5=0 then i used delta=b^2-4ac

then i found delta=-4.79

X1=-b+sqrt(delta)/2a
then i found x1=2.19 and x2=-b-sqrt(delta)/2a but as i learnd answer is 0.5 where is the my mistake? Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
melissax said:
Hi, may you help me?
I have a question I solved but couldn't ended.

If cos(x)+5Sec(x)=1.1 then Cos(x)=?

In-between these two lines, you have copied incorrectly. Where is the 2 coming from? Is that in the original problem or not?

2Cos(x)+5Sec(x) =11/10

2Cos(x)+5/Cos(x)=11/10

2Cos(x)*Cos(x)+5=11/10*Cos(x)

2Cos^2(x)+5=11/10*Cos(x)

2Cos^2(x)-11/10-Cos(x)-5=0 then i used delta=b^2-4ac

You have made another error here: $(11/10)\cos(x)$ became $(11/10)-\cos(x)$.

You need to be more careful when you go from one line to the next. Pretend someone's holding a gun to your head and will fire if you make a mistake!

then i found delta=-4.79

X1=-b+sqrt(delta)/2a
then i found x1=2.19 and x2=-b-sqrt(delta)/2a but as i learnd answer is 0.5 where is the my mistake? Thank you

For the original problem, I get complex values for $\cos(x)$. Can you please post the original problem verbatim?
 
question is "2cos(x)+ 5sec(x)=1.1" problem isn't wrong.

Correct but can you help to solution?
 
In your original post you wrote the problem as "cos(x)+5Sec(x)=1.1" then you switched the "cos(x)" to "2cos(x)" on the next line. We can't tell if this is a math mistake which we need to explain or just a typo. I'm going to guess it's a typo.

[math]2\cos(x)+5\sec(x)=1.1[/math]

Multiply everything by $\cos(x)$ and you get

[math]2\cos^2(x)+5=1.1\cos(x)[/math] or [math]2\cos^2(x)-1.1\cos(x)+5=0[/math]

This has a quadratic form to it. Let $u=\cos(x)$ and rewrite the above equation as

[math]2u^2-1.1u+5=0[/math]

Can you make progress from here?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top