MHB Solving Algebra Problems: 2.(c,i),(c,ii),(c,iii) Exam Paper

  • Thread starter Thread starter pretzel1998
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving specific algebra problems from a past exam paper. For question 2.(c,i), the correct approach involves rewriting the equation as rx² - tx - h = 0 and solving it as a quadratic. In question 2.(c,ii), the response confirms that the expression -1/6(x+6)(x-6) is incorrect, and the correct form is h = 2x - (x²/6). Lastly, for question 2.(c,iii), the answer of 4.96m is validated as correct when substituting the height of 1.9 into the equation. Overall, the thread provides clarifications and corrections for the algebraic problems presented.
pretzel1998
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hiya.

Im having problems with Questions 2.(c,i),(c,ii) and (c,iii) question on this past exam paper. http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/nqfdocs/ncea-resource/exams/2014/91261-exm-2014.pdfCan someone check my answers and explain the questions where I face planted? Thanks!

2. (c,i). I got h/(rx-t) = x, I know this is wrong because there is 2 x's in the equation which I am pretty sure is not correct. I factored out the x and divided both sides by (rx-t), where did I go wrong?
2. (c,ii). I got -1/6(x+6)(x-6), I'm pretty confident about this one, but can someone please check it anyways? I'm often wrong when I am confident hahaha.
2. (c,iii). I got 4.96m (rounded to 2 dp), I substituted in 1.9 as the height and solved the equation found in the above question to find the width of the lane. Did I do it right?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi pretzel, and welcome to MHB!

pretzel1998 said:
Hiya.

Im having problems with Questions 2.(c,i),(c,ii) and (c,iii) question on this past exam paper. http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/nqfdocs/ncea-resource/exams/2014/91261-exm-2014.pdfCan someone check my answers and explain the questions where I face planted? Thanks!

2. (c,i). I got h/(rx-t) = x, I know this is wrong because there is 2 x's in the equation which I am pretty sure is not correct. I factored out the x and divided both sides by (rx-t), where did I go wrong?
Write the equation as $\color{red}{rx^2 - tx - h = 0}$, and solve it as a quadratic in $\color{red}x$.

2. (c,ii). I got -1/6(x+6)(x-6), I'm pretty confident about this one, but can someone please check it anyways? I'm often wrong when I am confident hahaha.

I got $\color{red}{h = 2x - \dfrac{x^2}6}$. Notice that $\color{red}h$ must be 0 when $\color{red}x$ is 0 or 12.

2. (c,iii). I got 4.96m (rounded to 2 dp), I substituted in 1.9 as the height and solved the equation found in the above question to find the width of the lane. Did I do it right?
I agree with the answer 4.96m (rounded to 2 dp)

Thanks!
...
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top