MHB Solving an absolute value equation and the defference between two quadratics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving an absolute value equation and simplifying a quadratic expression. For the equation |2x-5| + 3 = 18, the correct solutions are x = 10 and x = -5, confirmed by a participant's clarification of the equation's structure. In the quadratic simplification problem, (5x^2 - 3x + 8) - (-4x^2 - x + 10), the answer of 9x^2 - 2x - 2 is also validated as correct. The conversation emphasizes the importance of checking solutions in mathematical problems. Overall, both answers provided are accurate.
drop
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Basically I don't know anyone in real life that can help me with this, so I need help checking to see if my answers are correct :)

PART A

9) Solve for all X: |2x-5| + 3 = 18

My Answer: x = 10, x = -5

10) Subtract and simplify: (5x^2 - 3x + 8) - (-4x^2 - x + 10)

My Answer: 9x^2 - 2x - 2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Please check my answers - 5

9.) Correct.

I would be inclined to write this equation as:

$$|x-2.5|=7.5$$

Now we can see that $x$ is a number whose distance from 2.5 is 7.5 units, or:

$$x=2.5\pm7.5\implies x=-5,\,10$$

10.) Correct.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top