Solving an Annoying Equation with Trigonometry and Constants

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter latentcorpse
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation involving trigonometric functions and constants. Participants explore various methods for manipulating the equation, particularly focusing on the role of the hyperbolic secant function (sech) and substitutions to simplify the problem. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and exploratory problem-solving.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the equation (dx/dt)^2 = (Mgh/A)*(2x-1)*(1-x)^2 and seeks help with the solution involving sec(theta) and sech(sqrt(Mght/A)).
  • Another participant suggests a substitution y = 1/x - 1 to help with the problem but acknowledges that the sech function remains confusing.
  • Several participants express difficulty in understanding how the substitution aids in deriving the sech term and request deeper explanations.
  • One participant attempts to manipulate the equation using the substitution and expresses uncertainty about how to integrate the resulting terms.
  • There is a back-and-forth regarding the integration process, with participants suggesting different substitutions, including trigonometric functions and hyperbolic functions.
  • Another participant proposes using sech instead of cos for integration, noting that it might simplify the process.
  • One participant realizes that their earlier assumptions about theta were incorrect and suggests using a different variable to avoid confusion.
  • A later post presents a detailed solution involving logarithmic integration and transformations, but it is unclear how this relates to the original goal of expressing sec(theta) in terms of sech.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the complexity of the problem and the usefulness of substitutions, but there is no consensus on the best approach to take or the correct interpretation of the sech term. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the final form of the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the integration steps and the role of specific substitutions. There are also mentions of missing assumptions and the potential for confusion due to variable naming.

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
(dx/dt)^2 = (Mgh/A)*(2x-1)*(1-x)^2
where x=cos (theta)
and M,g,h and A are all constants

the solution is

sec(theta) = 1 + sech(sqrt(Mght/A))
if u can do it then could u please list your full answer cos i can get quite far into it and then the sech thing just confuses me

i think it involves using the weierstrass elliptic p function

HELP?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
latentcorpse said:
(dx/dt)^2 = (Mgh/A)*(2x-1)*(1-x)^2

the solution is

sec(theta) = 1 + sech(sqrt(Mght/A))

Hi latentcorpse! :smile:

Since they give you the answer :wink::

Hint: substitute y = 1/x - 1, and you get … ? :smile:
 
i forgot to mention that x = cos (theta)...my bad
 
also i can't get your substitution to work mainly because i don't see how that helps with the sech - i have little experience with sech so you might need to explain a bit more deeply how your getting that answer to work.

cheers guys
 
also i missed out the t.
ignor that first post.
here we go:

(dx/dt)^2 = (Mgh/A)*(2x-1)*(1-x)^2

the solution is

sec(theta) = 1 + sech((sqrt(Mght/A))t)

where x = cos theta
 
latentcorpse said:
also i can't get your substitution to work mainly because i don't see how that helps with the sech - i have little experience with sech so you might need to explain a bit more deeply how your getting that answer to work.

cheers guys

Substitute y = 1/x - 1, and show us what you get.

That'll give you something which you can conveniently take the square-root of.

Just try it! :smile:
 
ok, if i try y=1/x - 1, then x=1/(y+1) and dy = -x^(-2) dx so dx = a x^(2) dy

this means dx/dt = sqrt(Mgh/A) (2x-1)^(0.5) (1-x)

becomes

- [(y+1)^(-2) dy]/[(((2/y+1)-1)^(0.5))(1-(1/y+1))] = (mgh/A)^(0.5) t

which gives me the argument of the sech term on the right side but i can't get the rest out!
 
Hi latentcorpse! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ :smile:)
latentcorpse said:
[(y+1)^(-2) dy]/[(√((2/y+1)-1))(1-(1/y+1))] = √(mgh/A) t

Yes, but why have you stopped there? :confused:

What is (2/y+1)-1?

And what is 1-(1/y+1)? :smile:
 
well if y=1/x - 1 then

x = 1/(y+1)

and so y+1 = 1/x

then

(2/(y+1))-1 = 2x-1 = 2*cos(theta) - 1

and 1 - 1/(y+1) = 1 - x = 1 - cos(theta)

and then cos(theta)=1/(y+1), we have -sin(theta) d(theta) = -(y+1)^(-2) dy, giving

-[sin(theta) d(theta)]/[((2cos(theta)-1)^(0.5))(1-cos(theta)] = (Mgh/A)^(0.5) t

but how does this help us to integrate? i still can't see how the LHS works?
 
  • #10
latentcorpse said:
well if y=1/x - 1 then

x = 1/(y+1)

and so y+1 = 1/x

then

(2/(y+1))-1 = 2x-1 = 2*cos(theta) - 1

and 1 - 1/(y+1) = 1 - x = 1 - cos(theta)

and then cos(theta)=1/(y+1), we have -sin(theta) d(theta) = -(y+1)^(-2) dy, giving

-[sin(theta) d(theta)]/[((2cos(theta)-1)^(0.5))(1-cos(theta)] = (Mgh/A)^(0.5) t

but how does this help us to integrate? i still can't see how the LHS works?

Hi latentcorpse! :smile:

Forget theta … it isn't in the question, and it isn't really in the answer (sectheta is just 1/x).

And forget x … the whole point of substituting y for x is to get away from x!

In terms of y:

(2/y+1)-1 = … ?

And 1-(1/y+1) = … ? :smile:
 
  • #11
ok well i can't see any way of rearranging them other than factorising y+1

so that

(2/(y+1)-1)^(0.5) = (y+1)^(0.5)[1-y]^(0.5)
and,
1-1/(y+1)=(y+1)[(y+1)y]

and then substituting in and collecting these(y+1) terms with that one already on the numerator we get

-dy/[(1-y)^(0.5) (y+1)^(0.5) y]

now what?

also i see that sec(theta) is just 1/x but i think the reason I am finding this so hard is because I am looking so hard for where the sech term is going to come out
 
  • #12
Hi latentcorpse! :smile:
latentcorpse said:
… and then substituting in and collecting these(y+1) terms with that one already on the numerator we get

-dy/[(1-y)^(0.5) (y+1)^(0.5) y]

now what?

(hmm … what happened to that √ I gave you? :confused:)

Now write that as -dy/y√(1- y2). :smile:

Then make the obvious substitution. :smile:
 
  • #13
ok
my bad about the root sign and damn i just realized i forgot to copy it again

so the obvious substitution would be some trigonometric function because of that
(1-y^2)^(0.5) term

now by y=1/x - 1 i get y=sec(theta) - 1 but that mucks things up

so i tried just y = cos(theta)


giving dy=-sin(theta) dtheta

then our LHS rearranges to

[sin(theta) dtheta]/[cos(theta) sin(theta)]

which is just the integral of sec(theta) dtheta

and the integral of sec is ln( sec(theta) + tan(theta) ) and surely i want something with a sech^(-1) in it so that i can get my sech(sqrt(Mgh/A)t) term on the RHS.

?
 
  • #14
latentcorpse said:
then our LHS rearranges to

[sin(theta) dtheta]/[cos(theta) sin(theta)]

which is just the integral of sec(theta) dtheta

and the integral of sec is ln( sec(theta) + tan(theta) ) and surely i want something with a sech^(-1) in it so that i can get my sech(sqrt(Mgh/A)t) term on the RHS.

?

Yes, when you have a √(1 - y2), the usual substitution is either sin or cos, because sin2 + cos2 = 1.

But you can also use either sech or tanh, because sech2 + tanh2 = 1 also.

As you say, using cos gives you ln (sec + tan), which is really awkward.

So try sech intead of cos, and see what you get! :biggrin:
 
  • #15
ok
well if y = sech(theta), dy = -sech(theta) tanh(theta) dtheta

and 1-y^2 = [tanh(theta)]^2 and so the denominator is sech(theta) tanh(theta)

then -dy/[y(1-y^2)^(0.5)] becomes

[sech(theta) tanh(theta) dtheta]/[sech(theta) tanh(theta)] but then everything cancels and we just have the integral of dtheta do we not?
 
  • #16
latentcorpse said:
ok
well if y = sech(theta), dy = -sech(theta) tanh(theta) dtheta

then everything cancels and we just have the integral of dtheta do we not?

Yes! :biggrin:

And the integral of dtheta is … ? :smile:
 
  • #17
yeah but the integral of dtheta is theta
and that's equal to my right hand side of sqrt(Mgh/A) t
but if u look back to my first post that's not the solution i was aiming for

we're trying to get

sec(theta) = 1 + sech(sqrt(Mgh/A)t)
 
  • #18
actually might be able to do a part without you! yay!

is this because if we take sech of both sides

but then sech(theta) = y = sec(theta) -1 and so it all rearranges

fantastic!
cheers for all your help m8!

legend!
 
  • #19
latentcorpse said:
yeah but the integral of dtheta is theta
and that's equal to my right hand side of sqrt(Mgh/A) t
but if u look back to my first post that's not the solution i was aiming for

we're trying to get

sec(theta) = 1 + sech(sqrt(Mgh/A)t)

D'oh! :smile:

That's a different theta! :biggrin:

Try it with phi instead of theta … :wink:

EDIT: ah … you beat me to it … well done! :smile:
 
  • #20
Hi there!

Here's my solution:

[tex](\frac{dx}{dt})^2=\frac{mgh}{A}(2x-1)(1-x)^2[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dx}{dt}=\sqrt{\frac{mgh}{A}(2x-1)(1-x)^2}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dx}{dt}=(1-x)\sqrt{\frac{mgh}{A}(2x-1)}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{mgh}{A}=K[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dx}{(1-x)\sqrt{K(2x-1)}}=dt[/tex]
[tex]\displaystyle{\frac{1}{\sqrt{K}}\int\frac{dx}{(1-x)\sqrt{2x-1}}}=\displaystyle{\int}dt[/tex]

[tex]2x-1=z^2 <=> x=\frac{z^2+1}{2}[/tex]
[tex]2dx=2zdz <=> dx=zdz[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle{\int}\frac{1}{(1-x)\sqrt{2x-1}} dx}=\displaystyle{\int}\frac{z}{(1-\frac{z^2+1}{2})z} dz=\displaystyle{2\int}\frac{1}{1-z^2} dz=\displaystyle{2\int}(\frac{1}{2(1-z)}-\frac{1}{2(1+z)}) dz=\displaystyle{\int}(\frac{1}{(1-z)}-\frac{1}{(1+z)}) dz=\ln{\frac{1-z}{1+z}[/tex]

[tex]z=\sqrt{2x-1}[/tex]

[tex]\ln{\frac{1-z}{1+z}=\ln{\frac{\sqrt{2x-2}}{\sqrt{2x}}=\ln\sqrt{\frac{2-2x}{2x}}=\displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}\ln{2\frac{1-x}{x}}=\displaystyle{\frac{1}{2}}\ln{\frac{1-x}{x}}+c[/tex]


[tex]\displaystyle{\frac{1}{\sqrt{K}}\int\frac{dx}{(1-x)\sqrt{2x-1}}}=\displaystyle{\int}dt[/tex]
[tex]\frac{1}{2\sqrt{K}}\ln{\frac{1-x}{x}}+c=t[/tex]
[tex]\ln{\frac{1-x}{x}}=2\sqrt{K}(t-c)[/tex]
[tex]\displaystyle{\frac{1-x}{x}}=e^{2\sqrt{K}(t-c)}[/tex]
[tex]1-x=xe^{2\sqrt{K}(t-c)}[/tex]
[tex]x(1+e^{2\sqrt{K}(t-c)})=1[/tex]
[tex]x=\displaystyle{\frac{1}{1+e^{2\sqrt{K}(t-c)}}[/tex]
[tex]\cos{\theta}=\displaystyle{\frac{1}{1+e^{2\sqrt{K}(t-c)}}[/tex]
[tex]\sec{\theta}=1+e^{2\sqrt{K}(t-c)}[/tex]
[tex]\sec{\theta}=1+e^{2\sqrt{\frac{mgh}{A}}(t-c)}[/tex]

which is very similar to the solution given :) - s.o. has to prove the last term
 
  • #21
If s.o. finds a mistake in it, I would be glad to see where it is :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K