Solving Capacitor Questions with Different Plate Areas

  • Thread starter Thread starter jcpwn2004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a capacitor connected to a battery, specifically addressing the scenario where the capacitor plates have different areas. Participants are exploring whether each plate maintains the same charge and how to calculate the charges and voltages across multiple capacitors in a circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express uncertainty about whether the charge on each plate of the capacitor is the same and seek clarification on the implications of different plate areas. They also discuss calculating equivalent capacitance and the charges across capacitors in series and parallel configurations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the relationships between charge and voltage in series and parallel configurations. There is an ongoing exploration of how to approach the problem of calculating charges and voltages after determining equivalent capacitance, with various interpretations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies in their calculations of equivalent capacitance and express confusion about the relationships between charge and voltage in different capacitor arrangements. There is a recognition of the need to rebuild the circuit step by step to clarify the relationships involved.

jcpwn2004
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You have a single capacitor connected to a battery. However, the two plates on the capacitor do not have the same area. Does each plate still have the same charge? Explain

Homework Equations



C=Q/V=Eo(A/d)

The Attempt at a Solution



I really have no clue, I'm pretty sure the answer is yes but have no way to explain it.

Homework Statement



http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/3907/physicsef8.jpg

Homework Equations



Q=CV Ceq = C1 + C2

The Attempt at a Solution



I just need help with part B for finding the charges and voltage across for C1 & C2.

Well I got the Ceq to be 12uF and then to find the charges I use Q1 = C1V but that comes out to like .01 and I know that's not right...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't say that I know the answer for question 1. My gut instinct is the same as yours.

Also, your equivalent capacitance is off. You might want to re-check that number.

After you do that, start rebuilding your circuit from the equivalent capacitor. Capacitors in series will have the same charge, but different voltage differences. Capacitors in parallel will have different charges, but same voltage differences.
 
Yah I wrote that equation wrong, I already solved for the equivalent capacitor and got the right answer in the back of the book. I don't get how I go from there though and start solving for other stuff. Like the Ceq is 4 micro farads, what do I do to start finding out other stuff?
 
{1/12 + 1/4 + 1/6)^-1 isn't 4.

Like I said, you start rebuilding the circuit and work your way from there with the hints I've given you.
 
Snazzy said:
{1/12 + 1/4 + 1/6)^-1 isn't 4.

Like I said, you start rebuilding the circuit and work your way from there with the hints I've given you.

Lol wow I'm an idiot I was looking at the wrong problem. Ok here's what I have the Ceq is = to 2uF. Q3 = .0002 C Q4 = .0002 C V3 = 33.3V & V4 = 50V. I don't understand how to get the charge for the capacitors in series...
 
The charge for any number of capacitors in series is the same. Remember that for series capacitors, the charge on each capacitor is equal, and for parallel capacitors, the charges add up.
 
Snazzy said:
The charge for any number of capacitors in series is the same. Remember that for series capacitors, the charge on each capacitor is equal, and for parallel capacitors, the charges add up.

I still don't get it haha thanks for the help though. Right now I'm looking at Q1 = C1xV. so Q1 = (8uF)x(100V)...which is .0008 which isn't right :(.
 
Don't start off with C1 first, mate. First of all, you can combine all four capacitors into one giant capacitor, right? You can then find the charge in the giant capacitor. You can then break this giant capacitor into three smaller capacitors, each one of them having that charge you calculated earlier since they are in series. You can then find the potential difference across the first, second, and third capacitors that you obtained by breaking the giant capacitor, yes?

Now the first capacitor in that circuit can be further broken into two smaller capacitors in parallel with each other. You know that for parallel components, the voltage drop is equal for both capacitors but the charges are different and from this you can find the charge for C1 and C2.
 
Last edited:
Snazzy said:
Don't start off with C1 first, mate. First of all, you can combine all four capacitors into one giant capacitor, right? You can then find the charge in the giant capacitor. You can then break this giant capacitor into three smaller capacitors, each one of them having that charge you calculated earlier since they are in series. You can then find the potential difference across the first, second, and third capacitors that you obtained by breaking the giant capacitor, yes?

Now the first capacitor in that circuit can be further broken into two smaller capacitors in parallel with each other. You know that for parallel components, the voltage drop is equal for both capacitors but the charges are different and from this you can find the charge for C1 and C2.

wow i finally figured it out, thanks so much man I love you!@(!@!@!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K